Discussion:
[Deathpenalty] death penalty news-----TEXAS
Rick Halperin
2007-02-17 02:37:42 UTC
Permalink
Feb. 16


TEXAS----impending execution

Newton Anderson Scheduled for Execution in Texas


Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott offers the following information about
Newton Anderson, who is scheduled to be executed after 6 p.m. Thursday,
February 22, 2007. Anderson was sentenced to death for killing a Tyler
couple during a burglary of their home.

FACTS OF THE CRIME

On March 4, 1999, Frank and Bertha Cobb arrived home, catching Anderson in
the process of burglarizing their residence.

Using the Anderson's shotgun, Anderson fatally shot Frank and fatally
shot, suffocated, strangled and sexually assaulted Bertha. After killing
the Cobbs, Anderson robbed them, set their house on fire and fled in the
couples maroon Cadillac.

After responding to the fire, firemen brought the blaze under control and
found Frank's body in the kitchen. He had been shot in the head at close
range with a shotgun, and was lying face down with his hands and feet
bound with electrical tape. At that point officials declared the house a
crime scene and ordered the firemen off the premises.

While leaving the house, a fireman discovered Bertha's body in the living
room. She also was face down and bound with electrical tape. Electrical
tape also covered her mouth and nose; she was not clothed from the waist
down; she had been shot many times in the head; and she had been raped and
strangled.

On the day of the murders, Anderson pulled into the trailer park where he
lived with his brother-in-laws nephew and asked for help unloading
clothing, a duffle bag, a suitcase, toiletry items, and an oscillating fan
from the maroon Cadillac. The Cobbs' son later identified those items as
having come from his parents' home. Anderson left the trailer park after
unloading the property, and after returning, he told the nephew that he
abandoned the Cadillac off the highway behind a building. Officials later
discovered the vehicle where Anderson said he had left it.

That night, Anderson asked his brother-in-laws niece and her boyfriend for
a ride to a Dallas night club. He offered to pay them 80 dollars, which
was unusual because Anderson did not ordinarily have extra cash. Bertha
had cashed a check for $892.00 that very day, and kept eight hundred
dollars in cash, but investigating officers found no cash in the Cobb
home. Also unusual were the expensive clothes Anderson was wearing.

Witnesses at the night club observed that Anderson had a large amount of
cash and bought a round of drinks for everyone at the bar. When asked
whether he had broken into someone's house, Anderson replied, "Yeah. I did
something like that." Anderson later told his sister that he "did it."

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In March 1999, Anderson was indicted for the capital murders of Frank and
Bertha Cobb. In May 2000, a jury returned a "guilty" verdict and a death
sentence. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed both verdicts in
May 2002. In March 2003, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied
Andersons state habeas petition.

In April 2003, Anderson obtained federal habeas counsel and, learning of
the trial court's intention to set a May 2003 execution date, asked a U.S.
district court to stay his execution. On May 1, 2003, the federal court
ordered a stay. Anderson filed his federal habeas petition 10 months later
and was denied in January 2006.

He appealed to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the state
district court set his execution for July 26, 2006, though the prior stay
was still effective. On November 1, 2006, the 5th Circuit Court affirmed
the lower courts decision to deny relief.

On January 5, 2007, Anderson filed a petition for certiorari review in the
U.S. Supreme Court and an application for a stay of execution pending
disposition of his petition. The petition and stay request are pending
before the court.

CRIMINAL BACKGROUND

Before killing and robbing the Cobbs, Anderson served jail time for family
violence assault. He also had a burglary conviction and was sentenced to 8
years probation in that case. When Anderson committed 4 more burglaries
less than three months into his probation, his probation was revoked and
he was sentenced to 8 years in state prison. Three months after he was
paroled from prison, Anderson killed Frank and Bertha Cobb.

Andersons criminal activity was not confined to Texas. Previously, he
committed burglary and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in California,
where he received a six-year juvenile offender prison sentence. Within two
months of his arrival at the juvenile detention facility, Anderson
escaped.

While in jail, awaiting trial for capital murder in the slayings of the
Cobbs, Anderson obtained or made a rope and used a hacksaw blade to cut
through an air vent in his jail cell. On another occasion, Anderson
smuggled a razor blade into the courthouse, cut his leg restraints, and
escaped during a pretrial hearing. Anderson also possessed a shank and
attempted to bribe a correctional officer to leave his cell door unlocked.

MISCELLANEOUS

For additional information and statistics, please go to the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice website, www.tdcj.state.tx.us

[source: Texas Department of Criminal Justice]

(source: US News and Information)

***********************

DPS crime lab employee held in cocaine possession


An employee at the Texas Department of Public Safety's Houston crime lab
appeared in court today after he and 2 other men were accused of stealing
cocaine from the facility.

Jesus Hinojosa Jr., 30, along with Roberto Reynoso,35, and Tommy
Norris,33, were charged with possession of more than 400 grams of cocaine
with intent to deliver the illegal substance, officials said.

A technician at the Jersey Village lab since 2002, Hinojosa was arrested
earlier this week after authorities discovered he had been smuggling
cocaine out of the lab in order to sell the drugs for several years, said
District Attorney Charles Rosenthal, Jr.

After another chemist in the lab got different results for a sample of
cocaine she had previously tested, she went to her lab supervisor who then
made conclusions that led them to begin an investigation into the lab,
Rosenthal said.

"He would take cocaine out the lab and pass it to one particular person
who would repackage it and then he would put the repackaged goods back in
the vault,'' he said, adding that he does not know what the replacement
material was.

After questioning Hinojosa, who resigned from DPS Thursday, authorities
set up a sting to capture Reynoso and Norris who were both arrested
Wednesday night.

In addition to the drug charges, Reynoso was also charged with using a
deadly weapon when the offense was committed.

Rosenthal said the approximately 26 kilograms of cocaine stolen from the
lab should not affect any Harris County cases because they do not use the
DPS lab often and because Hinojosa was stealing cocaine that was already
scheduled to be destroyed.

"He was looking for high-grade cocaine, so he would steal it after it had
been analyzed,'' he said.

A DPS spokesman declined to reveal any other details of the case besides
the announcement of Hinojosa's resignation.

He remained in the Harris County Jail today under a $1 million bond.
Reynoso remained in jail on a $750,000 bond and Norris with a $500,000.
Their next court appearance is scheduled for March 20.

Rosenthal said he didn't think the arrests would affect any other cases.
However, he has notified the state district attorney's association about
the situation in case cases in other jurisdictions were compromised.

(source: Houston Chronicle)

***************

Innocence Project to review Dallas County convictions-----Group will
decide whether 354 cases warrant DNA testing


The extraordinary number of DNA-based exonerations in Dallas County has
led to a unique partnership between prosecutors and advocates for those
who may be wrongly convicted.

Most of those requests already have been denied by trial court judges on
the recommendation of former District Attorney Bill Hill. Mr. Watkins, who
succeeded Mr. Hill on Jan. 1, wants to ensure that those decisions were
correct, his first assistant said.

"It's just simply the right thing to do," Terri Moore said this week.

Since taking office, Mr. Watkins has seen DNA evidence clear 2 men
convicted of rape. Those exonerations pushed Dallas County's total to 12,
higher than any other U.S. county and all but two states, according to the
national Innocence Project in New York.

More than 190 people have been cleared nationwide through genetic testing
since the 1st post-conviction DNA exoneration in 1989. A 13th exoneration
in Dallas County is expected over the next several weeks.

"When you hear 13 people, that's sobering," Ms. Moore said. "And you have
to say maybe it didn't happen on my watch, but it has happened. I am this
criminal justice system, and I have to do my part in it."

DeSoto cop says DA's office dropped case as favor

Attorneys with the 2 innocence projects began calling for a thorough
review of DNA applications in Dallas County last fall but had not
persuaded Mr. Hill to act. Mr. Watkins, on the other hand, almost
immediately began promising some kind of review.

Over the last month, he and Ms. Moore met with leaders of the Innocence
Project of Texas and agreed to allow volunteer lawyers and law students
access to a broad array of documents upon which to base recommendations
about testing.

The students would come primarily from Texas Wesleyan University's School
of Law in Fort Worth. Their selection would be approved by the district
attorney's office, they would be trained by experienced screeners from the
Innocence Project and they would have their work supervised by experienced
lawyers.

Organizers are working to line up participants and hope to start the
screening process in the next two months. The work is expected to take
several months to complete, said Jeff Blackburn, who heads the Innocence
Project of Texas.

Ms. Moore said the office is prepared to request testing in any case for
which it is recommended. If the cost of testing becomes an issue, she
said, private laboratories might be approached about providing a bulk rate
to the county.

Barry Scheck, co-director of the national Innocence Project, said he had
"no doubt" that if biological evidence is available and tests are
performed, more wrongful convictions will be discovered.

"There just always are," he said.

A radical change

Mr. Scheck and Mr. Blackburn pronounced Mr. Watkins' decision a sea change
for Dallas County.

"I think it's an unprecedented level of cooperation and unprecedented
sensitivity to the possibility that mistakes have been made," said Mr.
Scheck, one of the national pioneers in using DNA technology to free
wrongly convicted people.

Mr. Blackburn said he hopes the Dallas project can serve as an example to
other prosecutors, many of whom have offered stiff opposition since a
state law allowing convicted people to apply for DNA testing was passed in
2001.

"I think Mr. Watkins is blazing a trail in Texas," he said, "and showing
what a DA who cares ultimately about justice rather than the getting of
convictions should do and can do."

Mr. Watkins, a former Dallas defense attorney who is the first black
district attorney in Texas, has questioned whether his predecessors
operated in an even-handed manner.

He said in an interview last month that the number of DNA exonerations
left him wondering how many other people may have been wrongly convicted.

Ms. Moore said there was a concern that the approach to post-conviction
DNA applications practiced under Mr. Hill was not as objective as it
should have been.

"I don't know why it hasn't happened before," she said, "other than we
fall into the them-vs.-us."

Records provided by the district attorney's office list 434 applications
for DNA tests that have been submitted since April 2001. The applications
were submitted by 354 people who have been convicted, some of whom had
multiple cases or made more than one request for testing, the district
clerk's electronic records database shows.

Judges granted tests to 32 applicants, the district attorney's office
said. Of that group, 12 people were exonerated by testing, 9 had their
guilt affirmed, 5 had inconclusive results and the remaining 6 are
pending.

The district attorney's appellate section, which handles post-conviction
applications, declined to identify cases in which prosecutors opposed DNA
testing.

But several lawyers familiar with Mr. Hill's approach said his prosecutors
routinely opposed testing, especially in the first years after the testing
law took effect.

Vickers Cunningham, a felony trial judge until late 2005, when he resigned
to run for district attorney, said prosecutors were overwhelmed by the
number of applications they were being asked to review.

"The process had just begun and there were no rules, and they were just
being cautious," he said.

Mr. Cunningham said he supported Mr. Watkins' decision to take another
look at the DNA applications. But he said most of the requests presented
to him were "no-brainers" that did not meet the requirements set out by
the law.

John Rolater, who was deputy chief of Mr. Hill's appellate section,
declined to comment on what he described as the inner workings of the
office. He is now head of the appellate section in the Collin County
district attorney's office.

Welcomed by victims

The head of a Dallas victims' rights group also voiced support for Mr.
Watkins' decision and said she assumes that most crime victims would also
welcome it.

"They want justice, and they want the right person to receive punishment,"
said Kristianne Hinkamp, executive director of Victims Outreach.

Fred Moss, a former federal prosecutor who teaches law at Southern
Methodist University, called Mr. Watkins' decision laudable but not
without risk.

"The law-and-order types might see it as an attack on the police and the
prosecutors and maybe the judges and the juries that are necessary to
cause these wrongful convictions," Mr. Moss said.

"I think it might not make him terribly popular with some of the DAs that
work for him and maybe some of his fellow DAs across the state and across
the country."

(source: Dallas Morning News)

****************

Jessica's Law would allow death penalty for some child predators


A get-tough measure to punish sex offenders who abuse children, one of the
top issues for Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst in the legislative session, was
filed Wednesday with minimum 25-year sentences for first convictions and
the death penalty option for repeat molesters.

Sen. Bob Deuell, R-Greenville, filed the bill that has raised concerns
among prosecutors and victims' rights groups. They worry the tougher
measures could make it harder to get convictions in cases that are already
difficult to prosecute and could lead to even more violence against
children.

Legal experts question whether the death penalty is constitutional in a
sex case.

If passed, Deuell and Dewhurst called the bill a major deterrent to stop
sex offenders.

"We want to spread the word: Don't molest kids," Dewhurst said. "Justice
will be severe."

Gov. Rick Perry also has given the bill emergency status for the session.

The bill has 4 major provisions:

_Minimum sentences of 25 years to life for first time violent sex offenses
against children under 14.

_Lifetime global positioning satellite tracking for offenders.

_Allow for the death penalty for a 2nd offense against a child under 14.

_Double the statute of limitations for sex crimes against children from 10
to 20 years after the victim's 18th birthday.

In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a death sentence for a Georgia
man convicted of raping a woman, calling it an "excessive penalty for the
rapist, who as such, does not take human life."

5 other states have passed similar death penalty laws to the one proposed
in Texas. Although no one has been executed, one Louisiana inmate is on
death row for the rape of an 8-year-old girl. That case is still being
reviewed by state and federal appeals courts.

Dewhurst said he discussed the issue with prosecutors and several judges
on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which handles death penalty
appeals. He believes the bill would be constitutional because it is
narrowly tailored to a second offense against a child victim.

Dewhurst declined to identify whom he spoke with among the nine appeals
judges.

The Texas Association Against Sexual Assault previously opposed the death
penalty in child sex cases for fear it could lead to victims being killed.

Spokeswoman Torie Camp backed off that stance Wednesday, saying it would
likely only be sought in the worst, most violent cases. The death penalty
provision would not be mandatory.

"We'll leave that up to our prosecutors," she said. "If they feel like
they can succeed. then we can be supportive."

More troublesome for victims' groups is the 25-year minimum sentence for a
first-time offender. As most child sex abuse is committed by a family
member or close friend, families may be reluctant to report the crime if
it means a long sentence for a loved one, Camp said.

"We predict reporting rates will go down," she said. "That's a big concern
for us."

Cost estimates of the lifetime GPS monitoring would be about $14 a day, or
$5,110 per year per offender, Dewhurst said.

The bill is titled "Jessica's Law," after Jessica Lunsford, a Florida girl
who was abducted and killed in March 2005.

The Jessica's Law bill is SB 5.

(source: Associated Press)

**************

Trial set for adoptive parents facing capital murder charges


The couple accused of forcing their 4-year-old son to drink a deadly mix
of water and Cajun seasonings are set to go to trial March 26. Andrew Burd
died back in October from a sodium overdose that caused massive organ
failure. Thursday, Hannah and Larry Overton were arraigned after being
indicted last week.

The district attorney's office is expected to announce on Friday whether
they'll seek the death penalty. Hannah and Larry Overton were reminded
this week, just how serious this case is, as Hannah's attorney requested
to know whether the state will seek the death penalty against them.

Defense attorney John Gilmore said he believes the state will not.

"I'm relatively certain that they're not going to," Gilmore said. "Why
not? Because this is not a death penalty case. Even if they had done what
they're alleged to have done, this is not a death penalty case."

But prosecutors said it could be because Andrew Burd was just 4 years old,
and it is a capital murder charge.

"If you murder a child under the age of 6, that's capital murder," Sandra
Eastwood, prosecutor, said.

Prosecutors also asked the judge on Thursday to issue careful bond
restrictions for the parents out of concern for the newborn child, born
just weeks ago. The judge adopted the restrictions already imposed by
another court that require supervision at all times when the parents are
with the children.

Their attorney wouldn't comment on their defense strategy, but he said he
is confident that the real story will come out in court, and the couple
will be found not guilty.

Prosecutors, however, are also confident and added that it will likely not
be an easy trial to hear.

"These cases are always heartbreaking," Eastwood said. "So I know that it
will be very saddening in the courtroom to hear about some of the facts in
this case, but my duty is to present the evidence and see that justice is
served, so I'm very glad to be able to do that."

District Attorney Carlos Valdez will be the one to decide whether they'll
seek the death penalty or not and that decision will be announced Friday.
The reason that's important now is because death penalty cases require a
very different jury selection process, and attorneys on both sides need
extra time to prepare for such.

Again, as of Thursday, the trial date is set for March 26.

(source: KRIS TV news)

****************

Overton couple pleads not guilty in 4-year-old's death


Hannah and Larry Overton, charged with capital murder in connection with
the death of 4-year-old Andrew Burd, pleaded not guilty Thursday in the
214th District Court.

Hannah Overton, 29, fed Andrew a mixture of water and Cajun seasoning as
punishment on Oct. 2, according to arrest affidavits.

After drinking the mixture, Andrew vomited and drifted in and out of
consciousness. Hannah and Larry Overton, 30, waited nearly 3 hours before
taking the boy to a medical clinic, affidavits said.

He later was taken to Christus Spohn Hospital South, where he died the
next day, hospital officials said. The couple was in the process of
adopting Andrew, who was a foster child.

The couple faces trial March 26 in Judge Jose Longoria's court.

(source: Corpus Christi Caller-Times)

************************

Harlingen Man Charged with Murder, Burglary-----Murderer Confesses;
Victim's mother noticed withdrawals from son's account


A Harlingen man is charged with capital murder after confessing to
authorities and leading them to the victim's body.

Bryan Russell West is also accused of burglary.

Cameron County Sheriff's investigators say he shot 26-year-old Steven
Wagster with a 9 millimeter handgun he stole from Wagster.

West buried his friend in a wooded field in Harlingen. Investigators say
the two men were drinking there a couple of weeks ago.

The victim's mother called the sheriff's department when she discovered
repeated withdrawals from her son's debit card.

West told investigators when he killed his friend, he felt like he didn't
have a choice.

West claims Wagster was getting into drugs and into trouble.

"I wanted to do something with my life. And since we were such good
friends, I couldn't get away from him. And so I felt like this was the
only way to do it, it didn't make my life any better," says the confessed
murderer.

West's bond was set at $1,025,000. He could be sentenced to life in prison
or sent to death row.

(source: KRGV)

****************

Local woman awaits justice for father's death


It's a day Kerrville resident Gwynn Hudson-Simmons has been waiting on for
18 years.

It is the day she will travel to Huntsville to watch the execution of the
man who killed her father on Aug. 20, 1988, in Pecos County just nine
months before his retirement.

That fatal night

Hudson-Simmons' father, Pecos County Sheriffs Deputy Tim Hudson, 61, was
called out late on a Friday evening after 2 men stole $22.50 worth of gas
from a service station in nearby Bakersfield.

Hudson pulled up behind the van that matched the description at about
12:10 a.m. Saturday and turned on the lights of his patrol car in an
attempt to pull the van over on Interstate 10, west of Fort Stockton.

He didn't know the 2 men in the van had escaped from the State Release
Center in Shawnee County, Kan., a week earlier. He didn't know the driver,
Charles Edward Smith, 22, and his cousin, Carroll Bernard Smith, had
stolen the van, license plates, credit cards and a .357 magnum revolver in
Houston before heading to New Mexico.

When Hudson tried to pass the van on the left, Charles Smith fired 3 shots
into the patrol car, 1 of them striking the deputy in the side, killing
him.

"My dad's last radio transmission was running the plates," she said. "He
just thought it was a gas thief. He never knew they were escaped convicts.
He lived for about 90 seconds after he was shot, and we are thankful that
he didnt suffer."

The Smith cousins abandoned the van in Coyanosa and set it on fire before
stealing a tractor-trailer truck from a residence. A running gun battle
ensued between the 2 men and authorities, including county and city
officers, state troopers and a U.S. Customs helicopter.

"I will never forget that Saturday morning," said Hudson-Simmons, who was
28 with 2 small children at the time of her father's death. "I heard a
knock on the door and I thought 'Why doesn't dad just come on in?' But,
when I got to the door, it was the sheriff and my yard was filled with
officers."

Hudson was a 30-year veteran of law enforcement working in several West
Texas counties and cities, including Seminole, Midland, Stanton, Monahans
and Hobbs, N.M. He also was a U.S. Marine veteran who served during World
War II.

Trial after trial

A Pecos County grand jury indicted the 2 men shortly after Hudson's
murder, but it was 1 year later that Charles Smith stood trial. On Aug.
15, 1989, after 25 minutes of deliberating, a Pecos County jury found
Charles Edward Smith guilty of capital murder. Less than a week later, he
was sentenced to death by lethal injection. According to news reports from
the trial, at least 11 witnesses from Texas and Kansas testified for the
prosecution about Smiths behavior and previous actions.

One Pecos County jailer said Smith even attempted to escape the county
jail while awaiting trial. Smith was even heard over the jail's intercom
singing "I shot the deputy" to the tune of "I Shot the Sheriff."

Just after his cousin was found guilty and sentenced to death, Carroll B.
Smith pled guilty and was sentenced to life in prison.

For Hudson-Simmons, it looked like justice would be served, but justice
has had to wait.

"We knew there would be appeals, but we never realized we would have to
wait so long," she said.

In December 1991, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the 1989
conviction of Charles Edward Smith in a 7-2 decision.

"The appellate judge found that one of the original 12 jurors was a cousin
to a police officer, so they deemed the jury biased and threw the whole
damn thing out," she said.

A new trial was held in 1994, and Charles Smith again was convicted of
capital murder and sentenced to die.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals overturned the conviction again,
citing an error in the jury instructions given during the penalty phase of
the 2nd trial.

Finally, in November 1999, a West Texas jury found Smith guilty a third
and final time. He was given the death penalty again.

Hudson-Simmons had hoped the execution would be swift.

Justice at last

Hudson-Simmons finally got word from the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice that Charles Edward Smith will be executed on May 16.

She will watch his execution.

"This is not a happy occasion for anyone. I have prayed for this man and
his family for 18 years," she said. "I was against the death penalty, but
it's different when someone in your family is killed like this, and their
killer doesnt show any remorse."

Hudson-Simmons said Smith has threatened her and her family from prison.

"During the trial, he would turn around, smile and make obscene gestures
toward my mother in open court," she said. "He stated in his confession
that it has been his lifelong dream to kill a cop and that he felt like
his life was complete now. He said if he had a choice to do it over, he
would do it again, and he was very proud of what he did.

"Putting him to death will guarantee this man will not kill anyone elses
family member."

Hudson-Simmons has been warned about the death penalty protesters who will
be in Huntsville.

I know there are people against the death penalty, and it is going to be
difficult to see someone put to death, she said, "but I watched blown up
photos of my dad (in court) with 4 inches of blood in his floor board. I
can handle watching this guy getting euthanized. For us, this is closure."

Charles Edward Smith has been on death row for 18 years, and
Hudson-Simmons said that is a huge cost to taxpayers.

"Not only is this important to my family, but also from a taxpayer's point
of view," she said. "We pay for these people to live on death row. This
guy got a bachelor's degree in criminal justice for free while on death
row."

According to facts from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice about
death row, the cost per day per offender is $61.58.

"Multiply that times 18 years. It really adds up," she said. "We need to
execute these criminals in a timely manner. This sends the message that we
do not tolerate cop killers in Texas. Now, all we have to do is change
laws that require us to feed and house and educate these criminals for 18
years before justice is served."

Hudson-Simmons said she plans to work and talk to representatives about
pushing up executions.

Former Pecos County Sheriff Bruce Wilson, who was sheriff at the time of
Hudsons death, also will be present at the execution.

"Bruce and his wife, Martha, have been like second parents to me," she
said. "I can't thank him enough for everything he has done. Not only did
he work with my dad, but they were personal friends."

Remembering the man

Hudson-Simmons said she and her children, James and Julie, miss the man
who they called father and grandfather.

"He truly loved what he did and the fact that he could make a difference
in peoples lives," she said. "My son went on to become a Marine and is now
married and both he and my daughter grew up without him in their lives."

Mexia Police Detective Javier Ybarra also will attend the May execution.
Hudson impacted his life as a teenager.

"When he was a teenager, my dad caught him breaking into a store in Fort
Stockton," Hudson-Simmons said. "Instead of taking him in and putting him
in juvenile detention, he gave him the talking to of his life and made him
ride in the county car for 2 weeks. He told me if it hadnt been for my
dad, he might be in prison. This guy had a rough childhood, too, but he
didnt go out and kill cops, he became one."

Many of Hudson's friends and even his wife, Vera, are now deceased, but
his daughter says there is no denying that he was full of life and taken
too quickly.

"Anyone who knew him knew the kind of man he was, and I'm sure he would
want to thank all of the officers that were involved in this also," she
said. "He devoted his life to the safety and welfare of others."

(source: Kerrville Daily Times)

*********************

'Jessica's Law' lays down law


At least 20 states have adopted "Jessica's Law," legislation named after
Jessica Lunsford, a 9-year-old Florida girl who was abducted and murdered
by a registered sex offender in 2005.

Texas and Oklahoma are on their way to joining the club, which consists of
states that are fed up with sex offenders, many of whom manipulate the
U.S. justice system.

Texas Lt. Gov David Dewhurst is championing the Lone Star State's version
of "Jessica's Law" with a bill filed Wednesday. A similar bill was
approved in the Oklahoma House Criminal Justice and Corrections
Subcommittee Tuesday.

Not that any piece of legislation should be rubber-stamped, but lawmakers
have an easy decision.

Texas' version has earned the most scrutiny, with 25-year minimum
sentences for first-time violent sex offenders whose victims are under 14
and the possibility of the death penalty for a 2nd offense.

Extreme?

Not to those who value justice and the safety of children.

Oklahoma's version would require at least 25 years for sex offenses
against children under 12. The state currently has no minimum sentence.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice Web site, there are 27
registered sex offenders in Texas County in the Oklahoma Panhandle, and 7
in Beaver County.

According to the Texas Department of Public Safety Web site, there are 173
registered sex offenders in the 4 ZIP codes that are included in the
Amarillo area.

These individuals have already committed crimes - some heinous - and it is
time the justice system dealt with such criminals swiftly and severely.

"We want to spread the word: Don't molest kids," Dewhurst said. "Justice
will be severe."

Our children deserve nothing less.

(source: Editorial, Amarillo Globe-News)
Rick Halperin
2007-02-18 21:32:18 UTC
Permalink
Feb. 18



TEXAS:

Justice reclaimed-----After decades on death row, Kerry Cook had to learn
how to live again.


Beginning in the summer of 1977, when Linda Jo Edwards was found raped,
murdered and mutilated in her Tyler apartment, Smith County fought hard to
kill Kerry Max Cook for the deed.

Tried, convicted, sentenced to die and sent to the Ellis Unit in
Huntsville, Cook was raped shortly after his arrival and made a sexual
slave, a commodity to be traded like cigarettes in the death house
economy. Over more than 2 decades he endured 3 trials, appeals that raised
his hopes and dashed them again, brutal assaults and suicide attempts, the
last of which, in August 1991, included nearly severing his penis. He
dipped a finger in his own blood to scrawl a final message on the wall of
his cell: "I was an innocent man." The organ was reattached and Cook
recovered.

Over and over, his lawyers argued that Cook had gotten a raw deal,
railroaded to death row by prosecutors and police. Finally, the appeals
court agreed with them and ordered a new trial, his fourth. At the 11th
hour, prosecutors offered a deal, and Cook walked out of the Bastrop
County Courthouse a free man.

That was 8 years ago. But to borrow from Faulkner, the past is never in
the past for Kerry Max Cook.

His case has become a rallying cry for criminal justice reform advocates
and death penalty opponents. Where once his companions were the scum of
humanity, he now hobnobs with Ben Stiller, Bruce Springsteen and Susan
Sarandon. His tale is one of those told in the hit play "The Exonerated."
He has a book coming out Feb. 27, "Chasing Justice: My Story of Freeing
Myself After Two Decades on Death Row for a Crime I Didn't Commit" and a
Web site, chasingjustice.com.

These days, Cook lives with his wife, Sandra Pressey, and their 6-year-old
son, Kerry Justice Cook, in a Plano apartment complex overlooking a golf
course. They have a big-screen JVC TV, a Macintosh computer with a Scooby
Doo mouse pad and a couple of frenetic Jack Russell terriers.

Solidly built and square-jawed, he paces in his living room and talks
fast, like a man who's been struggling for a long time to be heard.

He says, "I think my case is as Kafkaesque as it could ever get in
America. A man was railroaded here."

Says Tyler attorney David Dobbs, who prosecuted him and is now in private
practice: "It's such a joke that we promote and support people such as
Kerry Max Cook in our world. . . . It has nothing to do with justice; it's
all about publicity and targeting weak cases from the past that are
vulnerable."

Says Paul Nugent, Cook's attorney: "Kerry's case is the most egregious
prosecutorial misconduct ever documented in Texas. . . . It is shocking.
Prosecutorial misconduct is easy to allege but it's hard to prove. We
proved it."

However you view it, the case has no shortage of tragedy. Linda Jo
Edwards, her life cut short at 21. Kerry Max Cook, sentenced to death at
21 and locked up for most of his adult life for allegedly killing his
neighbor and acquaintance.

And Cook will forever be defined by this dark history. It's the only story
he knows.

A life on death row

"This has been my entire life," says Cook, now 49. "I remember more of
death row than I do my entire childhood."

"When you go to prison, you're thrown into a lion's pit," he says. "There
is absolutely no help from the guards. None. You're there to die. It's
every man for himself. It was a killing field."

Fights were routine. A friend got stabbed to death with a chicken bone to
the heart. They didn't call it Gladiator School for nothing.

He was first raped within weeks of arriving, and had a vulgar expression
carved on his buttocks.

"There was only one way to escape: Stab and preferably kill the person
who punked you out," Cook writes. ". . . The moment another person even
uses the term 'punk' toward you or questions your manhood, the bizarre
world of prison justice takes over you either must attempt to kill him or
live as a sexual slave according to the whims of dark and tested men. The
point is to demonstrate to the prison hierarchy that you are prepared to
keep your respect at all costs."

Banking that his appeal would succeed and soon Cook chose not to fight
and risk killing somebody, and facing another murder charge.

So Kerry Cook was punked out.

"I couldn't afford to stand up for myself," he says as his wife and son
toss a ball around outside. "Even when I was getting raped."

Cook believed he had reasons to hope his conviction would be reversed. At
trial, Edwards' roommate, Paula Rudolph, had repeated what she had told
police that the man she saw in the apartment appeared to have white or
silver hair. Cook's hair was brown. A Tyler police sergeant had improperly
testified that fingerprints of Cook's the one piece of physical evidence
linking him to the crime scene were between 6 and 12 hours old, when
experts say there is no scientific method for dating latent fingerprints.
And there was at least one other suspect police should have seriously
considered: James Mayfield, an older married man with whom Edwards had
recently ended an affair.

That wasn't all. Early in his prison stay, The Dallas Morning News broke
the story that a fellow inmate, Edward Scott Jackson, had lied when he
testified against Cook at his trial and had been coached by the district
attorney's office and that a murder charge pending against Jackson was
later reduced to involuntary manslaughter.

Meanwhile, Cook's brief with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals sat with
no action for 8 years.

An unprecedented plea

"The lies kept me going. This is a case that was manipulated from the
start. First, there was a vicious rape and murder. Second, I was charged
for it. Those are the only facts."

Kerry Cook is sitting in a booth at the Cheesecake Factory. He unscrews
the top to the pepper shaker and pours spice on his Thai food; years of
bland prison gruel have made him crave intense flavors.

In December 1987, the court finally ruled in his case, affirming Cook's
conviction. 11 days before his execution date, the U.S. Supreme Court sent
his case back to the Texas appeals court.

The turning point came when Cook wrote to Centurion Ministries of
Princeton, N.J., which seeks to reverse wrongful convictions by finding
new evidence. After collecting more than 50 interviews with associates of
James Mayfield, Linda Jo Edwards' onetime lover, the group issued a report
titled, "Why Centurion Ministries Believes Jim Mayfield Killed Linda Jo
Edwards."

After a re-hearing before the Criminal Court of Appeals, Cook's conviction
was reversed. A 2nd trial in 1992 ended in a hung jury.

At a third trial, in Georgetown in 1994, Cook was again convicted and
sentenced to death.

But in 1996, after attorney Paul Nugent wrote a 213-page appellate brief,
the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Cook's conviction in blunt
terms: "Prosecutorial and police misconduct has tainted this entire matter
from the outset. Little confidence can be placed in the outcome of the
appellant's 1st 2 trials as a result."

Jim McCloskey, Centurion's founder who investigated Cook's case, is even
more blunt.

"This is the rankest prosecutorial misconduct I've ever seen or ever hope
to see for the rest of my life," McCloskey says. This is as bad as it
gets. It was dastardly."

After a November 1997 hearing, Cook was released on an appeal bond.

In 1999, as lawyers prepared for a 4th trial in Bastrop, lab technicians
detected semen on the panties Linda Jo Edwards was wearing the night she
was murdered. It was James Mayfield's, not Cook's.

Meanwhile, the Smith County district attorney's office tried to negotiate
a guilty plea, giving Cook credit for time served. He refused, saying he'd
rather risk being convicted and executed. Minutes before his Bastrop
trial, the prosecution and defense finally made a deal: Cook would plead
no contest (legally, neither admitting guilt nor disputing the charges)
and leave prison.

It was an extraordinary event no-contest pleas are usually for lesser
offenses, not murder cases, and such a plea typically implies guilt. But
Cook specifically rejected any language that carried that implication.

"The no contest plea was historic no lawyer could recall a Texas judge,
or anywhere for that matter, ever accepting such a plea in a capital
murder case and allowing a defendant to maintain his innocence and walk
free," Cook writes. "After a 21-year struggle, my case was over in less
than 10 minutes."

Living in the world

"There's no getting around the fact that it was a difficult case, and that
in the earlier trials he was not treated like he should have been," says
Dobbs, the former prosecutor. "There's no question that's true. You have
to look at the legal context in '78. Things were done differently then. It
doesn't make them right. But at the end of the day, we made the decision
we had to make and we've moved on from it."

Moving on hasn't been that simple for Cook. His family was mostly gone.
His only brother was murdered in a bar fight while Cook was in prison; his
father died while he was in, and his mother in 2005.

He has had to re-learn life on the outside, including learning to drive
all over again. Once at a gas station, a woman almost called the police on
him when he asked for help locating the gas tank on his car.

Sandra Pressey: "I remember the 1st time I met him at the Amnesty
International meeting, he had trouble making eye contact and I thought he
was profoundly shy. But then we went out to grab a bite to eat and he
wouldn't even pick up the menu. He was never allowed to make any choices,
so given this freedom of making a choice was terrifying. He would panic.

"He's directionally illiterate. North, south, east, west it was just this
past year he got the concept. Because as you navigate through life you
make choices, but he was never allowed."

Kerry Cook, execution number 600, is gregarious, funny and has a voracious
appetite for knowledge: Pressey once gave him a week's worth of computer
tutorial videotapes, which he ran through in a day. He is also profoundly
lonely and lacks the social filters people take for granted.

One day he told Pressey about a phone call from a woman named Maria: "She
was asking about aluminum siding. She was so nice. We talked and talked.
She said it snows where she's at. She said she's going to send me
pictures."

Pressey concludes the story: "A couple days later, he got a letter and it
was from Minnesota or something. There's a picture of Maria, her daughter,
the snow. He would get himself in these situations because he loves
people. He was this odd mix of Rain Man, Forrest Gump and 'The Other
Sister' the Juliette Lewis character.

"He's very childlike. That's one of the reasons he and K.J. have that
special bond. Kerry is like another kid to him."

K.J. is every bit as outgoing as his father, sometimes telling strangers,
"My daddy was on death row for 20 years." The strangers' reaction often is
to remark on the boy's vivid imagination.

Cook, meanwhile, continues to show up on the anti-death penalty circuit.
He's spoken at Princeton and Yale and has appeared on "Nightline,"
"Frontline" and "The Today Show." (Once on Phil Donahue's program to talk
about "The Exonerated," in which Richard Dreyfuss played Cook, Cook joked,
"The last time I saw this guy, he was being eaten by a shark.") He also
speaks to young people about overcoming adversity but has a hard time
making a steady living.

Then there is his book, a horrific and well-written memoir that forced
Cook to relive experiences that might be better forgotten if they could
be. It's gotten good advance reviews and has been kindly blurbed by
Harvard Law School's Alan Dershowitz, former FBI director William Sessions
and others.

"I always said I'd write a book but nobody believed me," Cook says. "They
thought I'd be executed."

"The Kerry Cook who came out who was good at putting words together but
was scared to death has been replaced by a man who's even better at
putting words together, and he's gotten more sureness about how to live in
the world," says Kate Germond, Centurion Ministries' assistant director
and K.J.'s godmother. "But it's still hard. You don't exorcise the
betrayal these guys have endured."

Pressey: "If you just read the newspapers, you would think he was this
derelict, crazed, maniacal killer. When Kerry meets people, he's wondering
what they've heard about him, and he wants them to know, 'This is me.'
That's the intensity. He wants to be understood."

His past is always with him, whether applying for a job or getting stopped
by a traffic cop in Lancaster on the way home from lobbying the
Legislature. Cook wishes for a gubernatorial pardon, but that would
require the assent of Smith County authorities, which isn't likely to
happen. Barring that, he'd like to see the law changed to allow for
pardons in extraordinary cases such as his, pardons that could bypass
local authorities before going to the governor's office.

"He should not settle for this scarlet letter," Pressey says. "I'm glad
that he's finally demanding that. At first it was enough that he could
maintain his innocence. Now the freedom isn't really freedom. He's
convicted but innocent."

Cook says in many respects, it's not about him any more, it's about when
K.J. gets old enough for people to start asking questions, asking whether
his father is a vicious killer.

"Suffice to say the birth of K.J. was preordained and a miracle," he says.
"I'm everything to him. And if I'm everything to him, that's everything to
me."

(source: Austin AMerican-Statesman)
Rick Halperin
2007-02-22 04:07:13 UTC
Permalink
Feb. 21


TEXAS:

Convicted killer of U.S. couple set to die Thursday evening


A 30-year-old man faces lethal injection Thursday evening for the slayings
of a couple in 1999. The bodies of Frank Cobb, 71, and his 61-year-old
wife, Bertha, were found in the rubble of their burned home, which
authorities said Newton Anderson torched.

The execution would be the 5th this year in the United States' busiest
capital punishment state and the 1st of 4 scheduled over the next 2 weeks.

Lawyers for Anderson asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review his case and
block the punishment, but prosecutors said the case against him was
airtight.

"Absolutely no doubt, scientifically no question," said Matt Bingham, the
Smith County district attorney who prosecuted Anderson.

Anderson had an extensive criminal record. In California, he received six
years in a juvenile lockup for burglary and auto theft but escaped after
serving less than two months. In Texas, he had been jailed for domestic
assault and burglary and twice was apprehended trying to escape jail while
awaiting trial on the capital murder charge.

On death row, he was caught trying to cut his way out of his steel cell.

Anderson said he was living on the streets before he was a teenager to get
away from his alcoholic father and stepmother in Pittsburgh, California,
lived in tents with other homeless folks and turned to burglaries to
support himself and his street friends, taking not only valuables but also
food from home freezers.

Carolyn Sanders, whose mother and stepfather were killed, planned to be in
Huntsville, Texas, to witness the execution "just to see that it's ended."

"If you actually see it, then you know it's over and done with and that's
the end of it," Sanders, 52, said. "I'm not anticipating him saying
anything to us."

The next Texas inmate scheduled to die is Donald Miller, condemned for the
fatal shooting of 2 men during a 1982 robbery in Houston. Miller, 44, set
for injection Feb. 27, has spent more than 24 years on death row, making
him among the state's longest serving condemned prisoners. 2 more
executions are set for the following week.

On the Net: Newton Anderson http://www.deathrow-usa.us/newton_anderson.htm

Texas Department of Criminal Justice execution schedule
http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/stat/scheduledexecutions.htm

(source: Associated Press)

********************************

DPS officials were told of lax lab security----Audits identified problems
with the handling of drugs before last week's arrest for theft


Texas Department of Public Safety officials were aware of security
breaches in the handling of their drug evidence as recently as 2006 and as
far back as at least 2003 problems such as failure to log evidence out of
storage, containers of marijuana left open and the lack of a monitoring
system for a high-security drug vault according to the agency's internal
audits.

The revelation about the warnings comes in the wake of last week's arrest
of a technician at the state's Houston crime lab after a DPS investigation
discovered he apparently had been for years selling cocaine smuggled out
of the lab.

Jesus Hinojosa Jr., 30, has confessed to stealing the cocaine. He remains
jailed on the charge of the delivery of a controlled substance. In a
jailhouse interview with the Houston Chronicle, Hinojosa said it was easy
to smuggle the drugs.

About 26 kilograms, or about 57 pounds, of cocaine are missing from the
Houston DPS lab in Jersey Village, authorities said.

In the DPS' internal audit of the Houston lab in June, inspectors noticed
problems concerning the handling of evidence problems similar to ones
documented 3 years earlier.

DPS officials downplayed the problems cited in the audits.

"As audits reveal that additional security measures are needed, they have
largely been implemented," said DPS spokeswoman Tela Mange in a written
response to questions from the Chronicle. "Additional measures will be
implemented as a result of the (Hinojosa) incident."

But the chairman of the Texas Senate's Criminal Justice Committee, Sen.
John Whitmire, D-Houston, urged all crime lab officials in Texas to take a
hard look at their operations, though he stopped short of calling for a
statewide investigation of DPS labs.

"I need to see a little more emotion, a little more urgency about this
problem from the DPS officials and those who depend on this evidence, be
it a prosecutor, judge or police agency," Whitmire said. He added that he
plans to meet with DPS officials about the matter.

Drug transfers not reported

In the 2006 audit of the Houston lab, in response to the question of
whether the lab had a secure chain-of-custody record crucial for
presenting evidence during prosecution the inspector wrote that "evidence
transfers are not always entered into the laboratory database as required
by policy." Additionally, "some (lab workers) conduct analysis without
documenting their possession of the evidence." In other words, lab workers
were able to remove evidence from storage without reporting that they had
done so.

Three years earlier, a DPS audit of its Houston crime lab turned up
similar problems. Evidence in the lab's drug vault "were found be lacking
the date on the seal," the 2003 report stated. "This violates DPS
Laboratory policy as well as accreditation requirements."

The 2003 inspection of the Houston DPS crime lab also criticized the
backlog of evidence some of it 10 to 15 years old that should have been
destroyed.

Austin lab problems, too

The documents show that the problems aren't unique to the Houston lab.

In a 2004 DPS in-house inspection of its Austin lab, investigators took
issue with the handling of evidence in the bulk marijuana storage vault.

"(N)umerous bundles of evidence had not been sealed after analysis," the
report states. "Cuts into the bundles were made at the time of the
examinations and there were no attempts to seal the openings. Marijuana
could be removed without detection from these bundles."

In the Austin lab's main evidence vault, the seals on bundles of marijuana
were not initialed and dated, according to the report. Additionally, in a
draft version of the 2004 Austin lab audit, inspectors reported problems
with what was described as the "high security vault" used primarily for
storage of cocaine seizures. The report said that the vault "was not being
monitored by security personnel on a regular basis."

In 2003, internal audits also found problems with the security and
integrity of evidence at DPS labs in Austin, El Paso, Waco and Lubbock, in
addition to Houston.

All the internal audits were conducted by, among others, DPS lab
supervisors from other cities around the state. The reports were sent to
numerous DPS officials, including the DPS Commission, according to the
agency spokeswoman.

When asked if any attempts were made to determine if the problems
mentioned in the audits had resulted in compromised evidence and what
corrections had been made, Mange replied, "That is part of the
investigation going on right now."

Harris County DA confident

District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal still says he does not think the
integrity of Harris County criminal cases will be affected because his
prosecutions rarely involve evidence from the Houston DPS lab.

According to DPS, the Houston crime lab handles evidence from law
enforcement agencies in the nearby counties of Walker, Trinity, Polk,
Tyler, Jasper, Newton, Grimes, Waller, Austin, Wharton, Matagorda,
Brazoria, Fort Bend, Galveston, Liberty, Chambers, Hardin, Montgomery and
San Jacinto. However, the agency does occasionally analyze evidence for
agencies in Harris, Orange and Jefferson counties.

Whitmire continues to disagree with Rosenthal's assessment. "I'm just
amazed when one of these problems is discovered, everybody says it's
unique to that lab, or really doesn't affect that many cases," he said.
"One case is too many."

In 2003, the Legislature gave DPS the responsibility for monitoring the
accreditation of crime labs in Texas after widespread problems in the
Houston Police Department crime lab. In 2005, legislation was passed and
signed creating the Texas Forensic Science Commission, but the would-be
watchdog agency has yet to be funded.

*****************************************

Witness says, 'I just turned my back'----Killer's girlfriend at the time
says she did nothing to stop the contract hit on Atascocita woman


A woman who says she knew her boyfriend and another man planned to harm
Farah Fratta wept Tuesday as she admitted doing nothing to prevent
Fratta's murder.

"I just didn't want any part of it," Mary Gipp McNeil told jurors. "I just
turned my back."

McNeil, of The Woodlands, testified in the capital murder trial of Howard
Paul Guidry, a former neighbor who is accused of being the trigger man in
the 1994 slaying of Fratta.

Guidry, 30, was sentenced to death in 1997. A federal judge overturned the
conviction in 2004, ruling that Guidry had been tricked into confessing
and that hearsay testimony had contributed to the conviction.

Harris County prosecutors are again seeking a death sentence against
Guidry, who has pleaded not guilty. His attorney, Tyrone Moncriffe, and
prosecutors said they expect testimony in the trial's guilt/innocence
phase to be completed today in the court of visiting Judge Doug Shaver.

The victim's husband, Robert Fratta, and another man are on death row for
their roles in the hired killing. Prosecutors said Fratta, who was a
Missouri City public safety officer, hired Joseph Prystash to kill his
wife and that Prystash hired Guidry to help him.

Farah Fratta was found shot to death at her Atascocita home on Nov. 9,
1994.

McNeil, who was Prystash's girlfriend at the time, testified that she knew
about the plot but didn't tell police or try to stop Prystash from going
through with it. She later told her brother that the pair had killed Farah
Fratta, she testified.

McNeil said Prystash emptied spent shell casings from a pistol in her
bedroom the night of the shooting, hid the gun among his clothes in her
bedroom and then threw the casings in her kitchen garbage can.

She said she retrieved the casings and later threw them in a garbage can
at a shopping mall.

She also wrote down the serial number of the .38-caliber pistol because,
she said, she knew police would need the evidence. She gave them that
information later and was granted immunity from prosecution on condition
that she tell police all she knew about the killing.

Prosecutors said Guidry was arrested with the gun that was used to kill
Farah Fratta.

(source for both: Houston Chronicle)

*****************

Victim's group open to death penalty for worst sex offenders


A victim's advocacy group that has opposed the death penalty for
second-time violent child molesters is softening its stance, saying it
would likely be a rare situation and left up to a prosecutor to decide.

The Texas Association Against Sexual Assault had opposed the death penalty
provision of "Jessica's Laws" bills filed in the House and Senate. A House
committee scheduled a public hearing on its version Tuesday night.

Because child sex victims are often the only witness to the crime, the
group worried it could lead offenders to kill the child to silence the
witness.

But after discussions with the bills' sponsors, the group has been assured
the death penalty would be an option for the worst cases and not mandatory
for all repeat offenders, a spokeswoman said.

"It doesn't completely resolve the concern," said Torie Camp, deputy
director for the Texas Association Against Sexual Assault.

"It would be an unusual case," she said. "That would be the rare
circumstance where the death penalty option is used."

Shannon Edmonds, spokesman for the Texas District and County Attorneys
Association, would not speculate how often prosecutors would seek the
death penalty against repeat child sex offenders.

But he noted Louisiana has had a similar law for years with only one
offender sent to death row.

"They're not afraid to use the death penalty over there, but so far, it's
only been one case," Edmonds said.

Legal experts question whether the death penalty is constitutional in
cases where the victim was not killed.

In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a death sentence for a Georgia
man convicted of raping a woman, calling it an "excessive penalty for the
rapist, who as such, does not take human life." The current Louisiana case
is subject to state and federal appeals.

Prosecutors and victims groups still have concerns about other provisions
in the Jessica's Laws bills, which are named after Jessica Lunsford, a
Florida girl who was abducted and killed two years ago.

The House and Senate include the death penalty option. The House bill does
not include the Senate's minimum 25-year mandatory sentence for first-time
offenders.

Because the majority of child sex cases involve family members or close
friends, the prospect of such long prison sentences could lead to
nonreporting of crimes, Camp said.

Prosecutors also say long minimum sentences strip them of important
discretionary powers when pursuing child sex cases. The House bill, filed
by Rep. Debbie Riddle, R-Houston, extends the statute of limitations from
10 to 20 years after the victims' 18th birthday for all sexually oriented
crimes.

The Senate version, by Republican Bob Deuell of Greenville, extends the
limit for the same amount of time but for crimes against victims 14 or
younger.

Both versions include global satellite tracking of offenders.

The "Jessica's Laws" bills are SB 5 and HB 8.

(source: Associated Press)

**************

Deadly detention----Questionable deaths of Harris County Jail inmates
demonstrate urgent need for health care upgrade.


With more than 9,000 inmates packed daily into overcrowded and
understaffed facilities, the Harris County Jail can be a death trap for
prisoners, many of whom have a serious illness when they arrive. A
compelling investigation by Houston Chronicle reporter Steve McVicker
documents just how dangerous a stay in the jail can be for inmates, many
of whom have not been convicted of a crime.

Over the past six years, 101 inmates have died while in custody here, 22
in the last year. During the same 6 years, 70 inmates died in the Dallas
County Jail.

Chronicle interviews with Harris County Jail personnel and review of
county records link fully a third of the deaths in Houston to inadequate
response by guards and staff; allegations that inmates did not receive
vital medication and treatment; and alleged abuse of prisoners by jailers.
No jailer is accused of causing a death.

At any time, the jail confines more than 1,400 prisoners with serious
mental problems but has only 51 beds for the mentally ill. The rest, many
of whom are incompetent to take needed medications even if they have them,
are housed with the general inmate population.

The death of 44-year-old drug addict Calvin Mack on May 30, 2005, stands
out for the gruesome neglect that allowed him to bleed in agony for four
hours while a guard refused to summon help. In response to pleadings by
Mack and others, the now dismissed staffer allegedly quipped, "What do you
want me to do, get a Band-Aid for his ass?"

Even more telling, the Sheriff's Department never told the Harris County
medical examiner of the failure to render Mack timely aid. After an
autopsy the death was ruled an accident caused by a brain hemorrage
brought on by high blood pressure and drug abuse.

Last year Daryl Dwayne Kelley died in jail after being Tasered 7 times by
guards. He had been arrested at a private mental health clinic on charges
of stealing a police car but was judged competent to be placed in the
jail's general population. He refused to take medication for schizophrenia
and became violent. The Harris County medical examiner's report ruled the
death natural but also described extensive abrasions and bruises on
Kelley's body.

Deplorable sanitary conditions in which inmates have been forced to sleep
on floors next to toilets have led many prisoners to complain of staph and
other life-threatening blood infections.

These cases and others McVicker documents strongly support county
officials' proposals to build new jail facilities, and expand the space
for housing and treating sick inmates and bring the jail up to state
standards. The new facilities would provide secure cells and supervision
for prisoners undergoing drug detoxification or confinement because of
severe mental illness. There would be adequate space to quarantine
prisoners with communicable diseases.

There's no excuse for allowing human beings to be imprisoned in downtown
Houston in conditions reminiscent of the dumping grounds for the insane in
the 19th century. It's a blight on the reputation of this community, one
that needs to be removed as soon as possible.

(source: Editorial, Houston Chronicle)

****************************

Activists request a probe of jail deaths


Some community activists are calling for a federal investigation after a
recent review by the Houston Chronicle showed more than 100 inmates have
died over the past six years at the Harris County Jail.

Of those inmates who died in custody, more than 70 percent had yet to have
their cases adjudicated, records provided to the Chronicle show.

"They died innocent men and women," said Deric Muhammad with the Millions
More Movement Ministry of Justice.

The group on Tuesday faxed a letter to the U.S. Justice Department asking
for the federal inquiry.

"Many family members believe these deaths could have been avoided,"
Muhammad said. "We believe an independent investigation is necessary."

Harris County sheriff's officials on Tuesday said they would welcome an
examination into the jail from the federal government.

'No reason to be fearful'

"We have no reason to be fearful of any federal investigation into any of
those deaths in custody," said Lt. John Martin, a Sheriff's Office
spokesman.

Martin said the department could not talk about specific cases because of
federal privacy laws but would if family members released them from that
obligation.

Overcrowding has raised concerns about sanitary conditions at the jail
with some inmates being forced to sleep on the cellblock floor next to
toilets, according to the newspaper article.

"They are all human beings. It's unbelievable what's going on," said Mary
Ramos with the League of United Latin American Citizens, who also called
for a federal investigation.

None of the records that were analyzed by the Chronicle concluded that
jail staff directly contributed to the 101 in-custody deaths since 2001.

The small group of activists who gathered Tuesday outside the Harris
County Jail said they wouldn't be satisfied with an internal investigation
into the findings.

"The (jail) system as a whole is corrupt," Muhammad said.

(source: Houston Chronicle)
Rick Halperin
2007-02-22 23:14:34 UTC
Permalink
Feb. 22




TEXAS---impending execution

Man who killed elderly couple to be executed today


Frank and Bertha Cobb had lived in their rural East Texas home for more
than 20 years.

"They never even had a break-in," their daughter, Carolyn Sanders,
recalled.

On March 4, 1999, they came home to find a burglar, Newton Anderson, in
their house.

"Then it just got crazy," Anderson said, describing a frenzy that ended
with the couple tortured and killed.

Anderson, 30, faces lethal injection this evening for their deaths.

"I'm guilty," he told The Associated Press from death row. "I just can't
explain why all this took place."

The bodies of Cobb, 71, and his wife, 61, were found in the rubble of
their burned home, which authorities said he torched.

His execution would be the 5th this year in the nation's busiest capital
punishment state and the 1st of 4 scheduled over the next 2 weeks.

Sanders planned to be in Huntsville to witness Anderson's execution "just
to see that it's ended."

"I'm not anticipating him saying anything to us," Sanders, 52, said. "If
he did, I wouldn't be sure if I could trust what comes out of his mouth."

Lawyers for Anderson asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review his case and
block the punishment, but prosecutors said the case is airtight.

"Absolutely no doubt, scientifically no question," said Matt Bingham, the
Smith County district attorney who prosecuted Anderson.

Anderson had an extensive criminal record. In California, he received six
years in a juvenile lockup for burglary and auto theft but escaped after
less than 2 months. In Texas, he'd been jailed for domestic assault and
burglary and twice was apprehended trying to escape jail while awaiting
trial on the capital murder charge.

On death row, the red-haired prisoner was caught trying to cut his way out
of his steel cell, earning him the nickname "Hacksaw Red" from his fellow
condemned inmates.

"I'm infamous," he said.

Anderson was arrested at a motel in Dallas, where he fled the day of the
slayings. Witnesses had seen him walking in the area and then driving the
couple's Cadillac. He took the car to the home of a brother-in-law's
nephew, where he was living, to deliver some clothing, a fan and other
items later identified as belonging to his victims.

Firefighters responding to the blaze at the Cobbs' home found Frank Cobb
in the wreckage, face down with his hands and feet bound with electrical
tape. The retired Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. worker had been shot in
the head at close range with a shotgun. His wife's body later was
discovered, her hands and feet also bound and with tape over her mouth and
nose. The retired nurse was shot several times, strangled and raped.

"This was a case where he didn't just kill them and he just didn't take
their property," Bingham said. "He really tortured them."

Anderson had been out of prison only 4 months, released on mandatory
supervision, a form of probation, after serving about half of an 8-year
sentence for 3 counts of burglary.

"Since I was a kid I can look at certain houses and figure out if it's
easy to break into," Anderson said. "I've been in houses where people were
asleep."

The couple's home in New Harmony, about 10 miles northwest of Tyler, fit
Anderson's template.

"It was by itself, kind of secluded," he recalled. "There wasn't nobody
home. It was during the day."

Anderson said he was living on the streets before he was a teenager to get
away from his alcoholic father and stepmother in Pittsburgh, Calif., lived
in tents with other homeless folks and turned to burglaries to support
himself and his street friends, taking not only valuables but also food
from home freezers.

The next Texas inmate scheduled to die is Donald Miller, condemned for the
fatal shooting of 2 men during a 1982 robbery in Houston. Miller, 44, set
for injection Tuesday, has spent more than 24 years on death row, making
him among the state's longest-serving condemned prisoners. 2 more
executions are set for the following week.

Texas Department of Criminal Justice execution schedule
http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/stat/scheduledexecutions.htm

(source: Associated Press)

***********************

State District Judge Refuses Stay For Condemned Killer


A hand-written plea comes from a death row inmate scheduled for execution
Thursday night.

30-year-old Newton Anderson is set to die for the 1999 torture and killing
of Frank and Bertha Cobb in their Smith County home.

In a newly-released letter, Anderson asked trial Judge Cynthia Kent for a
stay of execution because "a lot of other states have stopped their
killings because of problems with the executions,"

Lethal injections are on hold in Florida after an execution in December
took 34 minutes and a second dose of drugs. Judge Kent said Texas state
law did not allow her to act in this case. Anderson's sole appeal rests
with the U.S. Supreme Court.

(source: KLTV News)

**********************

Police file 2nd capital murder charge against Lufkin man


Police filed an additional capital murder charge Wednesday afternoon
against a Lufkin man who allegedly shot his pregnant girlfriend Feb. 13.
The unborn baby died 1 day later, followed by the mother on Saturday.

Claudia Rodriguez, 20, died at a local hospital from a gunshot wound to
the forehead, three days after her unborn child died inside her because of
her critical injuries, police said. Rodriguez was five or six months
pregnant.

Police arrested Darrell Djuan Ivey, 20, about 6 p.m. Feb. 13 after
responding to a call of an alleged suicide attempt at 509 Packer Ave., off
Lakeview near Kurth Drive.

Ivey and Rodriguez apparently lived together, according to police.

Officers found Rodriguez lying on the living room floor with a gunshot
wound above her left eye, police said. Police recovered a 9mm pistol near
her body. Ivey, at the house when police arrived, was determined to be the
shooter, said Lt. David Young, police spokesman. Police have not released
details on how that determination was made.

Charles Meyers, a local defense attorney hired to represent Ivey, said his
client has shown remorse for Rodriguez and her family.

"Of course he is upset about it. It's a horrible thing," he said.

Meyers said it is too early for him to say anything about the facts of the
case.

"It's a very, very young case. The investigation is still ongoing. It's a
few months away from indictment. Our investigation is just beginning. It's
truly in it's infancy," he said.

After Rodriguez's unborn child died Feb. 14, detectives filed their 2st
capital murder charge against Ivey, accusing him of allegedly causing the
death of a child under 6.

An autopsy examination in Beaumont concluded the injuries caused a
stillbirth, Young said.

Rodriguez died Saturday in the intensive care unit of Memorial Health
System of East Texas in Lufkin, where she had remained in critical
condition after the shooting.

Under Texas law, killing more than 1 person during the same crime meets
the criteria for a capital murder charge.

Prior to his arrest, Ivey was attending classes at Lewis Unit Training
Academy in Woodville, a state prison guard training academy, according to
Michelle Lyons, public information officer for the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice. Ivey enrolled in the academy Feb. 1.

Ivey is now charged with 2 counts of capital murder and possession of
ecstacy and cocaine, according to Young. He was initially charged with
aggravated assault, but police later upgraded that to capital murder.

Ivey remained in jail Wednesday on a $500,000 bond for the 1st capital
murder charge, and 2 additional $50,000 bonds for the lesser charges. No
bond had been set for the 2nd capital murder charge.

(source: Lufkin Daily News)

**********************

'She was my baby,' victim's father says


Lex Baquer apologized to jurors Wednesday for shedding tears as he
testified in the trial of the man accused of murdering his daughter.

"She was my baby," Baquer said, wiping his eyes as he recounted the 1994
hired killing of Farah Fratta.

The woman's husband and another man remain on death row for their roles in
the slaying, but Howard Paul Guidry, accused of being the triggerman, is
on trial a 2nd time. His original capital murder conviction was
overturned.

The defense and prosecution rested their cases Wednesday and jurors are
expected to begin deliberating today after hearing closing arguments.

Guidry, 30, has pleaded not guilty. He received a death sentence in his
first trial and could return to death row if convicted again.

In his brief testimony, Baquer recounted going to his daughter's home in
Atascocita, in northeast Harris County, after she was shot twice in the
head Nov. 9, 1994. He said paramedics were trying to help her as she lay
on the garage floor.

"I could see she was having convulsions," said Baquer, 73. "She was
shaking."

Fratta, 33, died a short time later. She had been in the midst of a bitter
divorce and child custody battle with her husband, Robert Fratta, a
Missouri City public safety officer. He was convicted of capital murder
and sentenced to death for hiring Joseph Prystash to commit the murder.

Prosecutors say Prystash, who also was condemned to death, hired Guidry.

A federal judge overturned Guidry's 1997 conviction in 2004, ruling that
Guidry had been tricked into confessing and that hearsay testimony had
contributed to the conviction.

Also on Wednesday, Scott Basinger, associate dean of graduate studies at
the Baylor College of Medicine, testified that Guidry told him in 1997
that he had shot Farah Fratta. Basinger said Guidry made the statement
during an interview before his original trial.

2 men who are serving sentences in Texas prisons also testified that they
knew Guidry. Neandre Perry, 33, who is scheduled for release soon after
serving more than 12 years for aggravated robbery, said Guidry gave him a
.38-caliber pistol. Prosecutors say that pistol had been used to kill
Farah Fratta.

Kenno Deshawn Henderson, Minneapolis30, serving a 25-year sentence for
aggravated robbery, testified he heard Guidry say that a man owed him
$1,000.

Prosecutors maintain that Prystash and Guidry expected to receive about
$1,000, a Jeep and the pistol for carrying out the killing.

(source: Houston Chronicle)
Rick Halperin
2007-02-27 03:14:39 UTC
Permalink
Feb. 26


TEXAS----impending execution

Inmate taking his side to grave


A story that began a quarter-century ago is scheduled to conclude Tuesday,
when Donald Anthony Miller walks from his cell to the Texas death chamber
with a secret he said he plans to take to the grave.

In a letter to the Houston Chronicle last month, Miller declined to talk
about what happened the night in 1982 when he helped kill two men,
execution style.

"I don't mean to imply I'm a saint," he wrote. "I'm connected to this case
just not to the degree portrayed at trial A tale I'll continue to hold
close as a fool becomes a skeleton in the family closet!"

Miller, 44, was put on death row for his role in the aggravated robbery
and shooting deaths of Michael Mozingo and Kenneth Whitt.

According to court documents, Miller, Edward Segura and Daniel Woods had
Mozingo and Whitt deliver and unload $40,000 worth of furniture to
Segura's house. A resident of South Carolina, Mozingo brought the
furniture to Houston to sell. Miller and his 2 partners tied the 2 men's
hands in front of them, took their wallets and drove them and their truck
to an empty parking lot.

Once they ditched the truck, the 2 men were placed in a car and driven to
a desolate location off Aqueduct Road near Lake Houston. Woods, with a
sawed-off shotgun, then Miller, with a pistol, shot the 2 men in the back
of the head, at the base of their necks, according to court documents.

One in case released

Segura and Woods testified against Miller in plea-bargain agreements.
Segura, who got 25 years for robbery, was released in 1997, but his parole
was revoked and he finished his time in prison. He was released again
about 6 months ago, said his mother, Dorothy Segura.

Woods received 2 life sentences and remains in prison.

One of Miller's attorneys said prosecutors offered Miller life in prison,
but he turned them down.

"He said, 'Oh, no, that's 20 years, and I'll be an old man when I get
out,'" said Sylvia Robertson Brauer.

Miller declined an interview for this story. Brauer said he even refused
to talk to his attorneys about what happened until the end of the trial,
when he said he'd take the life sentence. By then, she said, the offer was
off the table because investigators had found the murder weapon.

Miller was convicted in Mozingo's murder but never tried for Whitt's
death. Family members for Mozingo and Whitt watched the trial, but none
could be reached for comment on the upcoming execution.

Miller wrote that he refused to plea bargain or talk to anyone involved in
the case, but his father signed an affidavit that Miller "begged" his
attorney to let him testify in response to testimony by Segura and a man
who corroborated Segura's story.

That man, Carlton Ray McCall, and Segura later recanted their stories.

Brauer said she does not remember Miller asking to testify on his own
behalf.

Information withheld

3 years ago, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Hoyt ruled that Harris County
prosecutors withheld information, including inconsistencies in Segura and
McCall's stories, that could have persuaded a jury to be lenient. He ruled
prosecutors did not let defense attorneys know that the witnesses changed
their stories between their initial interviews and the trial.

Hoyt ordered Miller released from death row unless he was retried within 6
months. But the Texas Attorney General's Office appealed, and the U.S. 5th
Circuit Court of Appeals reversed Hoyt's ruling.

"Traveling from one extreme to the other," Miller wrote. "I'm now awaiting
execution which needless to say wasn't exactly my preferred method of
freedom."

Miller talked about the climate of the trial, during which five of the
jurors received threatening phone calls telling them to vote for death.
All of the jurors were then sequestered at a hotel, which had a bomb
threat.

Long-lasting case

Bert Graham, first assistant to District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal, worked
on the case and said he was surprised it has taken this long to carry out
the execution.

"That's 25 years he got to live that his victim didn't," Graham said. "It
was a cold killing."

Juries that give a death sentence must rule that the defendant will
probably continue to be a danger to the community.

Appellate attorney James Rytting, who continues along with Philip Hilder
to file motions in the case, called Miller "personable and nice ... bright
and reflective" and said Miller's lack of a disciplinary record on death
row disproves the "future dangerousness."

Still, Rytting acknowledged, "Most likely, the state of Texas is going to
kill him."

(source: Houston Chronicle)

*********************

Jessica's misbegotten law


The version of Jessica's Law proposed by State Sen. Bob Deuell,
R-Greenville, will extend the death penalty to repeat child sex offenders.
We all no doubt look at such awful crimes with horror and want to protect
children. However, Deuell's legislation will create more problems than it
will fix.

Most children targeted by sex offenders are victimized by those in their
family. These victims are often encouraged to keep quiet to avoid
humiliating their family. Imagine how such pressure would increase if a
relative faced the death penalty. Suddenly, a law designed to protect
children through deterrence may just manage to further silence those who
are victimized.

Also, four states have recently halted executions as concerns about lethal
injection, innocence, racism, cost and deterrence continue to haunt the
national consciousness. Do our elected officials think cases involving sex
crimes against children are somehow immune to the problems that plague the
capital system? To expand the use of the death penalty at such a time is
irresponsible, and will make the Texas system more error-prone and unjust.

Texas needs to protect its children. However, a reactionary and violent
law is not the way to go about it. Victims and communities would be better
served by a nuanced and holistic assessment of the nature and causes of
sex crimes. The last thing we need is a law that appeals to our best
intentions while failing to deliver anything that will make us safer.

Bryan McCann

Comm. studies Ph.D. student

Campaign to End the Death Penalty

(source: The Daily Texan)

********************************

Sleuth gets spot on reality TV


Tommy LeNoir will lead amateur sleuths through realistic crime scenes. "I
was told I brought professionalism and credibility to the show," he said.

Arlington homicide detective Tommy LeNoir has been tapped to host Murder,
a weekly reality series scheduled to begin this summer on Spike TV.

The show will feature amateur sleuths trying to solve real slayings pulled
from police files throughout the country.

LeNoir signed on for 10 episodes with the approval of the Arlington Police
Department. He will tape the shows during his vacation.

In each episode, 2 teams of 3 will be taken to a replica of a crime scene.
They will gather evidence, meet with the coroner and have 48 hours to
reveal the killer.

LeNoir will then explain how the real crime played out. The contestants
who made the correct or more compelling case will have a donation made in
their names to charity.

LeNoir doesn't watch cop shows. Doing the real thing, he has little
interest in watching actors play make-believe.

"But I'm very happy with this show," LeNoir, 51, said. "It gets close to
what a real homicide investigation is like. It brings as much reality as
is allowed within a 45-minute window, and it reflects well on my
profession."

It also brings some credit and attention to the Arlington Police
Department.

LeNoir -- pronounced Len-Or around here but Lay-Nwar the closer you get to
southern Louisiana -- filmed a pilot in June. He said he got pretty good
reviews from test audiences.

"I was told I brought professionalism and credibility to the show," he
said.

Sharon Levy, Spike TV's senior vice president of alternative programming,
said LeNoir also brings a sense of reality and can speak with authority.
She said producers were impressed by his knowledge, inventiveness and
ability to communicate.

"He is a fantastic storyteller," Levy said. "We were compelled by him, and
we knew he would take it seriously but do nothing to compromise the
integrity of what homicide detectives do on a daily basis."

LeNoir said he's comfortable on camera. He does some public speaking,
teaches at the regional police academy and has appeared on several TV
shows, including American Justice, Forensic Files and Cold Case Files.

Christy Gilfour, a spokeswoman for the department, said several officers
have done TV, but this is the first time one has hosted a show like this.

"It's good to help people understand how police officers do their jobs,"
Gilfour said.

One common myth the show dispels is that all police have to do is find the
bad guy.

LeNoir said finding the killer is just 1/3 of equation. Often, detectives
know who the killer is. Then they have to prove it, and in a way that will
mean a conviction.

He's still working on one case that's decades old.

"I solved it 20 years ago," LeNoir said. "It's just taking me this long to
prove it."

LeNoir grew up in a military family in a New Orleans suburb. They moved to
Arlington in 1968 when his father took a job with Bell Helicopter. Young
Tommy graduated from Arlington High School in 1972, worked various jobs
and studied criminal justice at the University of Texas at Arlington
before joining the Arlington Police Department in 1980. He now lives in
Joshua.

He says he was attracted to law enforcement for its scarcity of "gray
areas."

"I like the idea of black and white and right and wrong," he said.

After 18 months on patrol and 3 years in narcotics, he became a homicide
detective. That was in 1985, and that's where he's stayed.

He has led several high-profile investigations that attracted worldwide
attention.

One was the so-called bathtub murders, the cases of 2 young Arlington
women who were sexually assaulted, murdered and dumped into their bathtubs
in 1996. Dale Scheanette of Arlington was found guilty of capital murder.
He is on death row.

LeNoir also helped build the case against Jack Reeves, an Arlington man
convicted in 1996 of killing at least 2 of his 4 wives. He was suspected
of killing a third wife, but it could not be proved. He is serving 99
years in prison.

The Reeves case, LeNoir said, was particularly satisfying. He said Reeves
liked playing games with detectives.

"There's nothing more satisfying than catching a killer who thinks he can
outsmart you and beat you," LeNoir said.

LeNoir also enjoys cases that are solved not through high-tech forensics
but through old-fashioned investigation and persistence.

They are things he hopes to share on Murder, tentatively set for Mondays
beginning in July.

Producers said that, within a few weeks, there should be a link to the
show at www.spiketv.com, where wannabe detectives can apply to be
contestants.

(source: Star-Telegram)

*****************

Supreme Court refuses to hear KC natives death row appea----KC native's
troubled past lands her on death row


A death row appeal of former Kansas City resident Cathy Lynn Henderson has
been denied by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Henderson, who was profiled in The Star Sunday, is scheduled to be
executed April 18 in Texas for the 1994 death of a 3-month-old boy she was
babysitting.

In the only media interview she has granted, Henderson told The Star last
week that Brandon Baugh's death was an accident and she was hopeful the
Supreme Court would agree to hear her case.

But the court announced Monday, without comment, its denial of her
petition. Her attorneys could ask the court to reconsider. They also are
preparing a request for clemency to be decided by the Texas governor.

Henderson, 50, was born in Kansas City and attended high school in
Trenton, Mo., before moving to Texas. She was convicted of capital murder
and sentenced to death in 1995 after doctors testified at her trial that
the fractured skull suffered by Brandon could not have been the result of
an accident.

After the baby died, Henderson said she panicked and buried his body, then
fled to the Kansas City area where she was arrested 11 days later.

(source: Kansas City Star)

*****************************************************

URGENT ACTION APPEAL
----------------------------------

26 February 2007
UA 45/07 Death penalty / Legal concern

USA (Texas) Joseph Bennard Nichols (m), black, aged 45

Joseph Nichols is scheduled to be executed in Texas on 7
March 2007. He was sentenced to death in 1982 for the murder
of 70-year-old grocery store employee Claude Shaffer in
1980. Joseph Nichols was 19 years and one month old at the
time of the crime. He has been on death row for 25 years.

On 13 October 1980, 24-year-old Willie Williams and Joseph
Nichols, both black, robbed a grocery store in Houston.
There were three employees in the store - Claude Shaffer,
white; Cindy Johnson, white; and Teresa Ishman, black.
During the robbery, Claude Shaffer was shot. He died from a
single bullet wound. Both assailants had fired their
weapons. Cindy Johnson was interviewed by police at the
scene, but Teresa Ishman left. She returned and gave her
name as Teresa McGee, but was not interviewed at the scene.
Defense lawyers later tried to locate Teresa ''McGee'', but
to no avail, and she played no part in the trials.

Willie Williams was brought to trial first. He pleaded
guilty to killing Claude Shaffer. He said that Nichols had
fired first but had not hit Shaffer. He said that Nichols
was ''already out the door and I had the gun still pointed
back toward the old man. I thought [Shaffer] was coming up
on me and I just fired''. The state presented the medical
examiner's evidence in support of its theory that Williams
had shot Shaffer. The prosecutor said to the jury: ''Willie
Williams is the individual who shot and killed Claude
Shaffer. That is all there is to it. It is scientific. It is
consistent. It is complete. It is final, and it is in
evidence... there is only one bullet that could possibly have
done it and that was Willie Williams'... Nichols is out the
door.'' The ''law of parties'' formed no part of the jury
instruction. This is the Texas law under which the
distinction between principal actor and accomplice in a
crime is abolished and each defendant may be held equally
culpable. Williams was sentenced to death in January 1981.
He was executed on 20 January 1995.

Joseph Nichols was brought to trial in July 1981. The state
argued that regardless of who fired the fatal shot, Nichols
was guilty under the law of parties. The defense argued
''abandonment'', that is that the murder had occurred after
Nichols had left the crime. The jury found him guilty of
capital murder, but a mistrial was declared after the jury
was unable to reach a sentencing verdict. Following the
trial, the prosecution interviewed some of the jurors and
learned that their doubts about whether Joseph Nichols had
been the person who had fired the fatal shot had left them
unable to agree on the death penalty.

Joseph Nichols was retried in February 1982 by the same
prosecutor. The jury was instructed on the law of parties,
but this time the prosecution primarily argued that Nichols
had fired the fatal shot. It did not base this about-turn on
any additional investigation. The prosecutor argued that
''Willie could not have shot [Shaffer]... [Nichols] fired the
fatal bullet and killed the man in cold blood and he should
answer for that''. The prosecution relied heavily on the
testimony of Cindy Johnson, arguing to the jury: ''I'll tell
you that it was [Nichols's] hand that did the killing. How
do you know that? Cindy saw it. She told you''.
Additionally, the state presented evidence from the same
medical examiner as in Williams' trial to support this new
theory that the bullet came from Nichols's position in the
store. In March 1982, the jury voted for a death sentence.

In 1992, a federal judge ruled that the prosecution had
presented false evidence by changing its argument from
Nichols's first trial to his retrial (Nichols II). Judge
David Hittner said: ''The State argued, the jury found, and
the court accepted the determination in the Williams trial
that Williams was the triggerman, not just a party to the
offence. That fact was established as the truth. This court
has concluded that the prosecutor in charge of Nichols II
offered evidence and argued to the jury and court that
Nichols was the triggerman. By prior judicial determination,
the evidence submitted was necessarily false. Accordingly,
this court finds that the prosecutor in charge of Nichols II
knowingly used false evidence to obtain the conviction and
sentence in Nichols II.'' Judge Hittner concluded that
''the due process boundary upon prosecutorial misconduct and
the appearance of basic fairness derived from that boundary
command a determination that, in a criminal prosecution, the
State is constitutionally [barred] from obtaining a fact
finding in one trial and seeking and obtaining an
inconsistent fact finding in another trial''. He said that
''Williams and Nichols cannot both be guilty of firing the
same bullet because physics will not permit it''. He
ordered that Nichols be released or retried. However, the
state appealed and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
overturned Judge Hittner's ruling.

In 1992, Judge Hittner had ordered the state to produce all
its files in the case. These revealed that Teresa McGee was
in fact Teresa Ishman; that the state had known her true
identity before Nichols's trials; had known that she would
not be at the Houston address provided to the defense; and
had interviewed her in the county jail prior to extraditing
her to Louisiana on a shoplifting charge (the reason Ishman
had assumed a false name). Her statements during those
interviews threw doubt on the reliability of Cindy Johnson's
testimony. For example, she claimed that Johnson could not
have seen the fatal shots fired because she had been hiding
in the bathroom at the time. Judge Hittner had not
considered the non-disclosure of evidence because it had not
been ruled on in state court. The issue was returned to the
state courts which concluded that the prosecution had failed
to inform Nichols's lawyers about the location and true
identity of Teresa Ishman, and that her testimony would have
in some respects been favorable to Nichols, but that the
suppression of her name and identity had not affected the
outcome of the trial. The federal courts have upheld the
death sentence.

In 1995, a US Supreme Court Justice wrote that executing a
prisoner who had been on death row for 17 years - eight
years less than Joseph Nichols has suffered - arguably
negated any deterrent or retributive justification for the
punishment. In 2002, in the case of an inmate who had been
on death row for about 27 years, another Justice wrote of
this ''extraordinarily long confinement under sentence of
death, a confinement that extends from late youth to later
middle age.'' If executed, the Justice stated, the prisoner
would have been ''punished both by death and also by more
than a generation spent in death row's twilight. It is
fairly asked whether such punishment is both unusual and
cruel'', in violation of the US Constitution.

Since the USA resumed judicial killing in 1977, there have
been 1,063 executions, of which 384 (36 per cent) have been
carried out in Texas. In 2006, Texas carried out 24
executions, five times as many as the next highest state
total. Five of the six executions in the USA so far in 2007
have been carried out in Texas. Race, particularly race of
murder victim, has consistently been shown to be a factor in
US death sentencing. Similar to the national picture, 75 per
cent of those executed in Texas since 1977 were put to death
for crimes involving white victims, and 21 per cent were of
black defendants convicted of killing white victims.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send appeals to arrive as quickly
as possible (please quote Joseph Nichols' prison number,
#709, in appeals):
- expressing sympathy for the family of Claude Shaffer, and
explaining that you are not seeking to condone the manner of
his death or to downplay the suffering caused;
- expressing deep concern at the state's tactics in this
case, including the prosecution's use of inconsistent
arguments to obtain two death sentences in the same crime,
and the state's failure to disclose the name and identity of
an eyewitness whom it knew the defence lawyers were trying
to locate;
- noting that Joseph Nichols has been on death row for 25
years, and that US Supreme Court Justices have raised
concerns that such use of the death penalty may amount to
excessive and cruel punishment;
- calling for clemency for Joseph Nichols in the interest of
justice.


APPEALS TO:
Rissie Owens, Presiding Officer
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
PO Box 13401
Austin, Texas 78711-3401, USA
Fax: 1 512 463 8120
Salutation: Dear Ms Owens

Governor Rick Perry, Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 12428
Austin, Texas 78711-2428, USA
Fax: 1 512 463 1849
Salutation: Dear Governor


PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY. Check with AIUSA's Urgent
Action office if sending
appeals after 7 March 2007.

Amnesty International is a worldwide grassroots movement
that promotes and defends human rights.

This Urgent Action may be reposted if kept intact, including
contact information and stop action date (if applicable).
Thank you for your help with this appeal.

Urgent Action Network
Amnesty International USA
600 Pennsylvania Ave SE 5th fl
Washington DC 20003
Email: ***@aiusa.org
http://www.amnestyusa.org/urgent/
Phone: 202.544.0200
Fax: 202.675.8566

----------------------------------
END OF URGENT ACTION APPEAL
----------------------------------
Rick Halperin
2007-02-28 20:03:32 UTC
Permalink
Feb. 28



TEXAS----impending execuion

Robert Perez Scheduled For Execution


Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott offers the following information about
Robert Martinez Perez, who is scheduled to be executed after 6 p.m.
Tuesday, March 6, 2007.

Perez was convicted and sentenced to death for the capital murder of
Robert Rivas and Jose Travieso. A summary of the evidence presented at
trial follows.

FACTS OF THE CRIME

In the mid-1990s, the Mexican Mafia, or "La Eme," in San Antonio was in a
state of flux. The organization's president, Herbert Huerta, was sentenced
to life in federal prison, so he named Diane "Laura" Guzman as general of
the San Antonio division. Luis "Blue" Adames challenged the appointment,
naming himself as the new president. The organization split in 2, with
each faction determined to assassinate the alleged traitors in the other
group. Huerta's supporters included Robert Perez, Robert Herrera, and
Frank Estrada,

In April 1994, Perez, Herrera and Estrada spotted Adames's car in San
Antonio. They went home to arm themselves and then returned to the area,
looking for Adames. They intended to kill him. Instead, they found Adames'
supporters both Jose and Jesse Travieso and Robert Rivas. A barrage of
gunshots followed, and Perez's group killed Rivas and Jose Travieso, and
wounded Jesse Travieso. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

December 11, 1997 A Bexar County grand jury indicted Robert Perez for the
capital murder of Robert Rivas and Jose Travieso

. May 21, 1999 After a change of venue to Dallas County, a jury found
Perez guilty of capital murder and following a separate punishment
hearing, the court assessed a sentence of death.

September 19, 2001 Perez's conviction and death sentence were affirmed on
direct appeal by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

February 15, 2001 Perez filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in
the state trial court. April 30, 2003 The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
denied habeas relief.

October 14, 2003 Perez filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in a
Dallas U.S. District Court.

June 24, 2005 The federal district court denied habeas relief on all of
Perez's claims.

March 23, 2006 The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied Perez
permission to appeal and affirmed the district courts denial of habeas
relief.

June 2, 2006 Perez sought certiorari review in the U.S. Supreme Court.

October 2, 2006 The Supreme Court denied certiorari review.

October 19, 2006 The trial court entered an order setting the execution
date for March 6, 2007.

PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY

The Mexican Mafia has a violent and extensive criminal history; during the
early 1990s, it virtually had a stranglehold on San Antonio. In 1996,
Perez and Robert Herrera, Perez's right-hand man, controlled the gang.
Just months after Travieso and Rivas were murdered, Adames was murdered.
Perez not only ordered the hit, he had planned it. Additionally, Perez
ordered the murders of several other people. Emilio Barrera Alejandro died
as a result of 13 gunshot wounds, 11 to the head and 2 to the chest.
Earnest Ybarra died as a result of 12 gunshot wounds. Adam Tenorio was
killed because he disobeyed an order not to discuss the West French Place
murders. He died as a result of 11 stab wounds. Robert De Los Santos was
killed for the same reason as Tenorio. He died as a result of blunt force
trauma and strangulation. Daniel Moreno was killed as an example to other
members, having failed to perform some task he had volunteered to do. He
died as a result of 2 gunshot wounds, one to the face and one to the
chest. Elijilio De La Garza ("Chico") died as a result of 11 gunshot
wounds, including 5 to the head. De La Garza was the one who said that
Perez had ordered the killings at West French Place. Presumably, he was
killed for this reason.

The West French Place murders mentioned above were, at the time, the most
violent and bloody in San Antonio's history. While at least 2 former
members of the Mexican Mafia disputed that Perez ordered the murders, both
acknowledged that Perez had ordered the hijacking. It was thought that
large amounts of both cocaine and cash would be found in the targeted
apartment. Those who participated went armed with shotguns. All 5 people
found in the apartment were bound with duct tape. Then, for reasons still
unclear, all 5 were shot and killed. Only 5 pounds of marijuana and $300
in cash were confiscated.

(source: All American Patriots)

**************************

Harris County man executed for 1982 shooting deaths


Donald Miller offered no final words before being put to death by lethal
injection Tuesday evening.

Miller, 44, a native of Harris County, was convicted in 1982 for the
murders of Michael Dennis Mozingo and Kenneth White that same year.

Mozingo was shot in the head after Miller committed an aggravated robbery
of the man, also shooting White in the head shortly after in February
1982. The bodies of both were found by a fisherman along a road near Lake
Houston. Miller was only 19 when he committed the murders and was on
parole for vehicle theft.

Neither victims nor inmate had friends or family in attendance.

Miller was pronounced dead at 6:16 p.m.

Prosecutors described the victims as traveling salesmen from North
Carolina, selling furniture from the back of an 18-wheeler. Their
bullet-riddled bodies were found by a fisherman near Lake Houston.

Miller, who was tried only for Mozingos murder, was the sixth condemned
inmate executed this year in Texas, the nations most active capital
punishment state. Five more convicted murderers are set to die next month,
including 2 next week.

Miller arrived on death row in 1982, making him among the longest serving
of almost 400 Texas prisoners awaiting lethal injection.

"Very disappointing," said Bert Graham, one of the Harris County district
attorneys who prosecuted Miller for capital murder. "It's 25 years he's
been living and Mr. Mozingo has been gone for 25 years and his family
hasnt had the opportunity to share that 25 years with him."

Mozingo was carrying at least $5,000 in cash. The furniture taken from his
truck was valued at some $40,000.

The U.S. Supreme Court in October refused to review Miller's case. Millers
attorneys filed a late appeal in the state courts, arguing prosecutors
improperly suppressed evidence and the trial judge refused to force them
to give it to defense lawyers.

"It might have influenced one of the jurors to not give a death sentence,"
said James Rytting, Miller's lawyer. "The trial court made some really
horrific rulings."

But the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals disagreed Monday and dismissed the
appeal. A similar appeal already had been rejected by the federal courts
and Rytting said he planned no additional appeals. He made no clemency
petition to the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and the governor,
characterizing those as futile.

Miller declined to speak with reporters in the weeks preceding his
scheduled execution. In a letter to the Houston Chronicle, however, Miller
said he was "connected to this case just not to the degree portrayed at
trial."

Court records show Miller and companions Danny Woods and Eddie Segura
lured the furniture salesmen to Segura's house for a delivery Feb. 2,
1982. When the pair arrived, they were confronted by Miller, armed with a
handgun, and Woods, who pulled out a shotgun.

The 2 men were robbed, gagged and bound with electrical tape, then were
taken to an area near Lake Houston in northeast Harris County.

Testimony showed Miller shot Mozingo in the head, firing at least 5 times
and continuing to fire even after the bullets in his pistol ran out. Woods
shotgun was fired with such force the wood stock broke.

Miller was arrested about 2 weeks after the slayings. He said he was
involved in the robbery but not the shootings.

Segura pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery charges, was sentenced to two
25-year prison terms and was the key prosecution witness against Miller.
He was released in October under mandatory supervision, a form of
probation. Woods pleaded guilty to murder, received two life terms but did
not testify. Hes next eligible for parole in April 2008.

A federal judge threw out Miller's death sentence in 2004, ruling
prosecutors improperly withheld evidence. But the following year, a panel
of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to reverse the lower
court ruling.

(source: Huntsville Item)

**************

Detectives Found Evidence 2 Years After Whitaker Killings - At Bottom Of
Lake Conroe

The lead detective who worked the 2003 Whitaker family killings testified
in the 2nd day of Thomas "Bart" Whitaker's murder trial that police found
Bart's missing cell phone almost 2 years after the deaths of his mother
and younger brother in a bag at the bottom of Lake Conroe.

The bag contained key evidence that helped investigators understand how
the murder plot was carried out, and that also tied Bart Whitaker and a
co-defendant to the murders, according to Assistant Fort Bend County
District Attorney Fred Felcmans opening statement in the case on Monday.

Bart Whitaker, 26, is accused of hatching a plot that resulted in the Dec.
10, 2003 shooting deaths of his mother, Patricia Whitaker, and younger
brother, Kevin Whitaker, as the 2 entered their Sugar Land home after a
night out at a restaurant. Bart and his father, Kent Whitaker, also were
shot as they entered the house, but both survived.

Police have said they believe Bart Whitaker's roommate at the time,
23-year-old Chris Brashear, was hiding in the house with a gun, waiting
for the family to arrive. They have said they also believe Brashear
purposely shot Bart in the shoulder, in an attempt to make investigators
believe the family had surprised a burglar. Steven Champagne, 24, is
alleged to have waited a block away in a getaway car in which Brashear
escaped.

Both Bart Whitaker and Brashear were charged with capital murder in the
case, and prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for Bart, against Kent
Whitaker's wishes. Champagne has cooperated with police and prosecutors,
and struck a deal in which he is expected to plead guilty to murder in
return for a 15-year prison sentence.

It was Champagne who led detectives to the bag in Lake Conroe, according
to testimony by Sugar Land Police Det. Marshall Slot, lead investigator on
the case.

In his opening statement during the first day of the trial, Felcman said
after Brashear, Champagne and Whitaker were arrested in the fall of 2005,
Champagne began cooperating with police.

Champagne told investigators the 3 men drove from Whitaker's townhouse in
Willis, with Whitaker and Brashear driving in Whitakers Chevy Yukon, and
Champagne following in a Toyota. They switched license plates on the
Toyota before getting to Sugar Land, according to Felcmans opening remarks
to the 400th District jury hearing the case.

Bart Whitaker had called his mother on the day of the murders and told her
he was coming to town and hoped to celebrate his pending graduation from
Sam Houston State University. The family went out to a Pappadeaux's
restaurant, then returned home.

Kent Whitaker testified on Monday that his youngest son, Kevin, had driven
back from the restaurant, had his keys with him and went to the door of
the family's home first, followed by Patricia Whitaker and then Kent. Bart
told the others he needed to retrieve his cell phone, which he said hed
left charging in his Yukon.

According to Kent Whitaker's testimony, Kevin, and then Patricia, were
each shot as they entered the home. Kent also walked inside and, like the
others, was shot in the chest, but he survived.

Felcman said in his opening statement that investigators learned that
after the murders, Brashear ran to the car where Champagne was waiting,
and the two drove off. On a trip back to Bart Whitakers Willis townhouse,
they stopped once to change the license plates back on the Toyota. Once at
the townhouse, they cleaned out the Toyota with a vacuum cleaner, then
took a number of items, placed them in a bag and dumped the bag in Lake
Conroe.

Detective Slot testified on Tuesday that Champagne was able to lead police
to the spot where, almost 2 years before, he and Brashear had thrown the
bag in the water. Divers with the Texas Department of Public Safety
recovered it.

Felcman said in his opening arguments that the bag contained a vacuum
cleaner, license plates, a pry bar with paint chips on it, some money that
had been burned, and a water bottle with Chris Brashear's DNA on it.
According to Slot's testimony, Bart Whitaker's cell phone also was in the
bag.

Felcman told the jury on Monday that the pry bar paint chips match paint
on a gun safe on the 2nd floor of the Whitaker's Sugar Land home, which
police found had been broken open prior to the murders. Investigators
believe a 9mm Glock pistol was taken from the gun safe and used to kill
Patricia and Kevin Whitaker.

Slot testified the investigators believe the suspect who shot the
Whitakers pulled drawers out to make it appear as though a burglary had
taken place, but the only thing missing appeared to be an envelope of cash
that had been in a closet in Kent Whitaker's bedroom. Felcman did not say
so directly, but it appears the missing money could have been what police
found burned in the bag in Lake Conroe.

Slot also testified Tuesday that Fort Bend County Sheriff's Deputy Keith
Pikett, a dog trainer with well-known tracking bloodhounds, was called to
the crime scene on the night of the murders.

Slot said the dog was given "scent swabs" taken from various places
including the Glock pistol found in the Whitaker home and believed to be
the murder weapon. At that point, the dogs "trailed" to Bart Whitaker's
Yukon, still parked on the street outside his parents' house after the
shooting.

Slot also testified that after Brashear and Champagne's arrests, the
detective obtained scent swabs from both men. He said Deputy Pikett later
set up a "scent lineup" with his bloodhounds on Jan. 9, 2004, in which the
dogs were shown scent swabs from the Glock pistol believed to have been
the murder weapon, and from a pillow case found at the crime scene. Both
dogs "matched up" the swabs to another scent swab obtained from Brashear,
Slot said.

The trial, being heard before 400th District Judge Clifford Vacek, is
scheduled to continue Wednesday morning.

(source: Fort Bend Now)

***************

Death Sentence Upheld for Roach-----Roach Appeal Denied


The death penalty stands for Tony Roach. Roach was arrested in Oklahoma in
1999 and sentenced to death for the murder of 37-year-old Ronnie Dawn
Hewitt in 1998. Roach confessed to killing.

According to the conviction, Roach entered the victims home through by
prying open a window, then hid in her bathroom before attacking her. Then,
when the victim was dead, Roach sexually assaulted the body. He then tried
to cover up the crime by setting the house on fire.

Today, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected issues raised by
Roach's lawyers including a challenge to the Texas death penalty.

(source: KFDA News)

*****************

Murderer denied Federal appeal


In Amarillo, a Federal Appeals Court has denied the appeal of a South
Carolina man convicted in the 1998 murder of an Amarillo woman.

Tony Roach was convicted of strangling Ronnie Dawn Hewitt, and then
setting her apartment on fire trying to destroy evidence after
burglarizing it.

His lawyers raised ten issues before the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals
in New Orleans, including a challenge to the Texas death penalty.

That court rejected all of them.

Some of the items stolen were recovered from pawnshops here in Amarillo
and in Guymon, Oklahoma.

Law officers from Oklahoma were questioning Roach for an unrelated case
when he confessed to killing Hewitt.

(source: KVII News)

****************

Woman's Shouting Disrupts Capital Murder Trial


In San Antonio, a woman's emotional outburst in a courtroom brought Joseph
Gamboa's capital murder trial to a temporary standstill Tuesday afternoon.

The woman disrupted prosecutors who were showing graphic autopsy photos of
a victim, Ram Ayala.

The woman shouted, "You did all this for $200?"

The woman was apparently a friend of the victim, officials said.

Spectators were warned that the photos were graphic prior to their
viewing.

The judge denied a defense motion for a mistrial but did instruct the jury
concerning the outburst.

"That person who shouted whatever they did was not a witness and was not
under oath." said Judge Bert Richardson of the 389th District Court to the
jury. "You are not to consider what they said in any form or fashion. Just
completely disregard whatever they had to say."

Ayala, who owned the Taco Land Tavern, was shot and killed during a
robbery at the bar at 103 W. Grayson on June 23, 2005.

A bartender was also shot to death.

Prosecutors accuse Gamboa of the killings and recommend he receive the
death penalty.

Prosecutors rested their case late Tuesday afternoon and defense will take
their turn on Wednesday morning.

(source: KSAT News)

*****************

Murder trial costs tap Randall funds


Paying for court-appointed attorneys has cost Randall County more than
expected.

Randall County commissioners had to approve a $65,000 transfer from
insurance and bonds to fund court-appointed attorneys after the defense
for Francisco "Frank" Chacon in a murder trial used more than $153,000.

The county budgeted $175,000 this year for court-appointed attorneys, but
has already spent $234,000, said Randall County Auditor Karon Kantor.

Randall County Judge Ernie Houdashell said the county has no choice when
it comes to paying legal fees for those deemed indigent.

"These guys are up on murder charges. They don't have any resources. The
taxpayer has to provide an attorney," Houdashell said.

Chacon was found guilty of first-degree murder in December and sentenced
to 25 years in prison for his part in the March 2003 slaying of Dustin
Pool. Pool's body was found buried under concrete beneath a Randall County
grain elevator after he was kidnapped, beaten and killed. Chacon is the
fourth man who has either been found guilty or pleaded guilty in
connection with Pool's murder.

Chacon filed a motion for a new trial, but it was denied this week. Walt
Weaver, an attorney appointed to represent Chacon, said he filed a notice
of appeal with the 7th Court of Appeals, but that it could take months
before an actual response is filed.

The county coffers will take another hit when Mark Edward Hanson goes to
trial Monday. Hanson is facing a murder charge for his alleged role in the
death of Donald Ray White, 28. White's body was found in January 2005
naked, bound and partially submerged in water near the southeast Amarillo
chipping site. Preliminary autopsy results showed White died of a gunshot
wound.

Hanson is also facing charges for an alleged assault against a corrections
officer while attempting to escape in October 2005. A month later Hanson
did escape from the Randall County Jail and faces charges for that episode
as well.

At least $17,750 has been spent on Hanson's defense to date, according to
court documents.

Selden Hale, the court-appointed attorney representing Hanson, said that
number will increase. Hale said investigators have been hired to help with
the case.

Hale said the defense is allowed to spend just as much as the prosecution
thanks to a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

"Finally, the Supreme Court has ordered equal protection under the law
when it comes to getting ready for a murder case," Hale said. "It started
off as a death penalty case ... after the bill started running up, they
(prosecutors) decided maybe they didn't want to try as a death penalty
case."

Hanson is scheduled to go to court Monday for the charge of assault on a
corrections officer. The murder trial and escape charges have yet to go to
court.

The cost of death penalty cases can have a chilling effect. Randall County
Criminal District Attorney James Farren said cost was one reason the death
penalty was not sought for Chacon.

"There's no telling what it would've cost," Farren said. "If the defense
had $180,000 worth of hours without the death penalty, by the time we
complete three weeks to six weeks of individual (jury selection), there's
no telling what it would've cost. This illustrates for you how expensive
these cases are to begin with."

Farren said county finances, along with the nature of the crime and
history of the alleged criminal, play a role in determining whether or not
to seek a death penalty.

"I've had some people upset with me - that cost should never be a factor.
That's just unrealistic," Farren said. "Let's say it costs $1 billion,
then everyone would agree we can't do that. It's not a question of whether
finances are a factor, it's a question of ... how expensive it has to be
before it becomes a factor."

(source: Amarillo Globe-News)

*****************

Cases illustrate need for innocence project


No system is fail-proof.

The increasing number of wrongful convictions being uncovered in Texas
indicates flaws in the state's criminal justice system.

During the past few years, 2 dozen Texas men have been exonerated by DNA
testing. 12 of them were prosecuted in Dallas.

The statistics are scary, and the situation is unconscionable.

It is time for the state to invest the resources and effort necessary to
review questionable convictions by creating an innocence commission.

It is not enough to release those prisoners who have been exonerated,
offer them monetary compensation and wish them a good life.

Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, and Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, have
introduced legislation to create such a commission.

Previous attempts have met with stiff resistance. The efforts resulted in
the formation of the governor's Criminal Justice Advisory Council, but its
aim is to review the system, not individual cases.

The Legislature also has funded innocence clinics at Texas law schools,
but those are not the innocence commission Thompson and Ellis seek.

According to the New York-based Innocence Project, a nonprofit legal
clinic and criminal justice resource center, 185 people in 32 states have
been cleared of their convictions through DNA testing.

California, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Illinois and North Carolina have
established innocence commissions in recent years as a result of the
attention those cases have focused on the impact that new and improved DNA
testing can have on criminal convictions.

Instead of worrying that this might be an attempt to make an end run on
the death penalty, opponents to the creation of an innocence commission
should focus on the need to ensure innocent people are not locked up
unjustly.

There are flaws in our criminal justice system; the exoneration of 24
convicted felons proves that.

Ignoring the problem won't make it go away.

(source: Editorial, San Antonio Expres-News)
Rick Halperin
2007-03-01 18:30:30 UTC
Permalink
March 1



TEXAS:

Push for death penalty in child sex cases slows down in Texas House


With renewed questions over the constitutionality and consequences of
allowing the death penalty in some child sex cases, the House on Wednesday
delayed a vote on a crackdown against sex offenders.

The bill, dubbed "Jessica's Law," seeks to add the death penalty for
repeat offenses against victims under 14 and adds other measures to
stiffen penalties for sex crimes.

With critics arguing the death penalty in child sex cases is likely
unconstitutional and could lead some offenders to murder their young
victims, the House put off the bill until Monday.

It was a significant change of course for legislation that seemed primed
to sail through the House and raises questions about its future, although
House Speaker Tom Craddick, a Midland Republican, said he thinks it will
pass. The Senate is considering a similar bill.

"We knew a lot of questions would be asked," Craddick said.

Supporters have called it a strong deterrent against sex crimes, but after
about 2 hours of debate, House Republicans joined a group of Democrats to
ask to slow it down.

"This is serious business," said Rep. John Smithee, an Amarillo Republican
who said he supports the bill but wanted to give lawmakers more time to
talk to local prosecutors and victim advocates. "This is human life we're
talking about. This bill will pass. (But) it raises serious questions."

The bill's sponsor, Rep. Debbie Riddle, R-Tomball, resisted the delay but
was voted down 131-10.

"This bill will pass out Monday," she said after the vote.

"Jessica's Laws" are named after Jessica Lunsford, a Florida girl who was
abducted and killed two years ago, allegedly by a convicted sex offender.

Gov. Rick Perry had deemed the bill one of the legislative session's
emergency issues, allowing lawmakers to act quickly. Lt. Gov. David
Dewhurst has made it one of his top issues in the Senate and the bill was
approved by a House committee.

But as Wednesday's debate wore on, more and more lawmakers raised
questions about wandering into such slippery constitutional ground.

The constitutional question is tied to a 1977 Supreme Court ruling that
reversed a death sentence for a Georgia man convicted of raping a woman.
The court called it an "excessive penalty for the rapist, who as such,
does not take human life."

Florida, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Montana and Louisiana have passed death
penalty laws for child sex crimes in recent years. Only Louisiana has a
child molester on death row and his case is still moving through the state
and federal appeals courts.

Victim advocates and prosecutors warn such laws can do more harm than good
if they lead perpetrators to kill victims who may be the only witness to
the crime.

"You provide powerful a powerful incentive to kill the victim," said Rep.
Mike Villareal, D-San Antonio.

Although Texas executes more inmates than any other in murder cases,
prosecutors have said the death penalty in sex cases would rarely be
pursued.

Riddle agreed, noting that her bill allow prosecutors to pursue life
without parole for repeat offenders. The death penalty would be used only
in exceptional cases, she said.

Our passion and concerns needs to be with the children who are the
victims," Riddle said.

"I want those who prey on our children to serve their full sentences. I
want those who do it repeatedly to be removed from our society either
through life in prison or their own execution," Riddle said.

The "Jessica's Laws" bills are SB 5 and HB 8.

(source: Associated Press)

*********************

Nichols Execution: Another Texas death row travesty


On the morning of Oct. 13, 1980, 19-year-old Joseph Nichols and
24-year-old Willie Ray Williams entered Joseph's Delicatessen in Houston
and approached the counter where 70-year-old Claude Shaffer was at the
register. Williams and Nichols each pulled out a gun and pointed it at
Shaffer, in an attempt to rob the store. According to court records,
Shaffer reached for a gun hidden behind the counter; as he ducked behind
the counter, Nichols fired his single bullet lodged somewhere behind a
magazine rack, and he ran from the store. Williams also began to retreat
but stopped at the front door. He fired at Shaffer who was now standing,
his back toward the door. The bullet killed Shaffer instantly; Williams
returned to the counter, grabbed the cash box, and ran.

Nichols and Williams were arrested, and each was charged with capital
murder. Three months later, in January 1981, after confessing to the
killing, Williams pled guilty and was sentenced to die; he was executed in
January 1995. Nichols pled not guilty: He'd been involved with the robbery
but did not intend for Shaffer to die, nor did he take part in the murder.
Nichols was tried twice for Shaffer's murder a deadlocked jury prompted a
mistrial the first time around; the 2nd trial ended with a guilty verdict
and a death sentence.

He is scheduled for execution on March 7.

It might be tempting to assume that Nichols' 25-year stay on the row is an
affirmation that the Texas capital punishment system functions properly
that a quarter-century behind bars means the courts have had ample
opportunity to review his appeals and have concluded, based on all
relevant evidence, that his execution will pass constitutional muster. But
that isn't true: With less than a week until his execution, there remain
serious questions about whether Nichols' execution is legally justifiable.

Joseph NicholsHis is a case plagued by prosecutorial misconduct and
incomplete judicial review. Harris Co. officials withheld from Nichols'
attorneys the true identity and whereabouts of a crucial eyewitness,
Teresa Ishman, one of two deli employees working with Shaffer the morning
of the murder. According to court records, Ishman told prosecutors it was
Williams and not Nichols who killed Shaffer, and she confirmed that
Nichols fled before the murder. Moreover, at Nichols' second trial,
prosecutors completely changed the official theory of the crime in order
to secure a conviction and death sentence. At Nichols' first trial,
prosecutors argued that Williams fired the fatal shot an assertion backed
up by the physical evidence and the testimony of the county medical
examiner and sought to convict Nichols not as the shooter but as a party
to the killing. But the jury deadlocked because Nichols wasn't the
triggerman. So at the second trial, in February 1982, prosecutors argued
instead that Nichols was the one who fired the fatal shot even though
Williams had already confessed to the killing and had been sentenced to
die.

State and federal courts have considered these omissions before, but only
in "isolation," says Nichols' attorney, Clifford Gunter, with the Houston
firm Bracewell & Giuliani. On Feb. 20, Gunter again appealed Nichols'
case, arguing that taken together, the problems with his prosecution are
so egregious that the death sentence should be overturned. "Nichols has
been inadvertently subjected to a procedural quagmire that has prevented
his unconstitutional conviction from being fully reviewed," Gunter argues.
"As a result, no court has ever addressed all of the constitutional
violations that led to Nichols' conviction for a crime he did not commit
a crime for which the confessed murderer has already been executed." In
short, the court has never ruled whether the individual instances of
misconduct could have the cumulative effect of rendering his punishment
unconstitutional.

In Williams' case, Harris Co. prosecutors asserted that the evidence
conclusively proved him the killer: "That is all there is to it. It is
scientific. It is consistent. It is complete. It is final, and it is in
evidence," they argued evidence they offered again during Nichols' first
trial. At Nichols' second trial, however, prosecutors abandoned all that
evidence and argued that Nichols was the shooter; this strategy was
possible only because the state continued to conceal eyewitness Ishman
from the defense, argues Gunter. Instead, prosecutors offered only the
testimony of another deli employee, Cindy Johnson, who claimed Nichols
fired the fatal shot. (According to Ishman, Gunter later discovered, there
was no way Johnson could've seen anything because she hid in the bathroom
once the robbery began.) By hiding Ishman, the prosecution was able to
convince jurors Nichols was the shooter: "And I'll tell you that it was
[Nichols'] hand that did the killing," declared the prosecutor. "How do
you know that? [Johnson] saw it. She told you."

A federal district judge first overturned Nichols' conviction based on the
state's changed theory of the crime (a due process violation), but the 5th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, ruling that the error wasn't
severe enough to "undermine confidence" in the guilty verdict. In a
subsequent proceeding, the court similarly ruled that hiding Ishman from
the defense was not so egregious as to undermine the verdict.

While Gunter hopes that the courts will now finally consider the errors'
cumulative effect and will throw out Nichols' death sentence, given the
complicated nature of the rules governing death-case appeals, it seems
unlikely. In fact, "the rules against successive petitions are so onerous"
that it is unlikely the courts will consider anything more than whether
the appeal was filed properly, says UT law professor Jordan Steiker. "By
successfully hiding their misconduct, the prosecution gets the benefit of
a process designed to 'streamline' appeals. It is one of the ways that
court doctrine rewards prosecutorial misconduct."

Gunter has also filed a petition with the Board of Pardons and Paroles,
asking that Nichols' death sentence be commuted to life behind bars
ordinarily, Steiker says, that would be the way to go with a case like
Nichols'. "If we had any sort of clemency process, this would be the
perfect kind of case," where the executive branch would step in to correct
an injustice the courts are ill-equipped to handle. But, he said, "That's
not Texas." For sure, the BPP isn't known for righting wrongs still,
Nichols' life might depend on its taking seriously the responsibility to
avert an injustice. "To be frank, we are accusing the State of having
deliberately manipulated the justice system in order to get a second
death sentence," reads Gunter's petition. "Executing Nichols would in
effect condone" that manipulation, he continued. "When does it end? It
should end now."

(source: Austin Chronicle)

*******************

On death row, few women wait----Bad life became horrible with murder of
baby


As a child, she ran from bullies in a Kansas City housing project. As an
adult, she ran from the responsibilities of motherhood.

And with her panicked final flight from the horror of holding a little
baby's lifeless body, she ran herself onto death row in Texas.

It likely will be the last stop in her tumultuous journey.

Henderson is scheduled to drift into death sometime after 6 p.m. April 18
when an executioner unleashes the flow of poison into her slender arm.

She is to die for the 1994 murder of a 3-month-old boy she was
baby-sitting. She will be only the 12th woman put to death in the nation's
modern era of capital punishment.

The self-described "nobody" maintains that the crushing skull fracture
suffered by Brandon Baugh was the result of a terrible accident. Her story
has attracted a nationwide network of supporters that includes Sister
Helen Prejean of "Dead Man Walking" fame.

In the only media interview she has granted, Henderson told The Kansas
City Star that she hoped her life might yet be spared, but on Monday the
U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Henderson's case.

But to the parents robbed of a lifetime of memories, Henderson's execution
will be well-deserved justice. The sad circumstances of her life are no
excuse for the violent circumstances of their little boy's death, Eryn and
Melissa Baugh said.

The Baughs found Henderson through a poster offering child-care services.

Henderson's home was immaculate, and her "bubbly" attitude impressed them.

For four months, things went fine. But when Melissa Baugh arrived at
Henderson's house to pick up her children on Jan. 21, 1994, nobody was
there.

Puzzlement slowly gave way to panic. Henderson's husband tried to reassure
the Baughs that she probably had just gone shopping with the children.

Later that night, the husband showed up at the Baughs' home with their
2-year-old daughter, whom Henderson had left with relatives. He had no
idea where Henderson or Brandon Baugh were.

The Baughs endured 11 agonizing days with no news.

After "America's Most Wanted" broadcast the story, a tip led the FBI to an
Independence, Mo., apartment, where agents arrested Henderson on Feb. 1.

In a written statement to the FBI, Henderson said she "panicked" and fled
after she dropped the baby and could not revive him.

After her arrest, Henderson refused to tell authorities where she buried
Brandon.

But she drew a map for her attorneys, who turned it over when ordered by a
Texas court. After investigators found Brandon's shallow grave,
authorities charged Henderson with capital murder.

Eryn Baugh said that when they were given their son's remains, they
learned how severely he had been injured.

"The back of his skull was crushed in," he said. "Picture an eggshell
shattered."

He never believed it was an accident and said Henderson gave too many
versions to be believed.

"Her stories don't wash."

Prosecutors told the Baughs it would be difficult to get a woman sentenced
to death, even in Texas. The Baughs insisted that they try.

At trial, doctors testified that Brandon's head injury could not have been
an accident. One said it was comparable to a fall of more than 2stories.
She was convicted and sentenced to death.

Facing death, Henderson said she felt "incredibly blessed" that she had
Prejean's love and support.

"She gives me a lot of strength, faith and hope."

Prejean has met with Henderson at the prison where she and nine other
women live on Texas's death row. Prejean, who thinks that Brandon's death
was an accident, helped find Henderson her current legal team and urged
hundreds of other nuns across the country to write Henderson.

People need to understand that Henderson is not a monster, said Prejean,
who has agreed to be Henderson's spiritual adviser and be with her if she
is executed.

"It's easy to kill a monster," Prejean said. "It's hard to kill a real
human being."

In her interview with The Star, Henderson said she wanted to tell the
Baughs that she was sorry and that she felt regret every day for the pain
she caused them.

"I wish there was something I could do to comfort them," she said, "and if
it's going to comfort them to end my life for an accident, I hope that
gives them comfort."

(source: Kansas City Star)

**********************************

PA murderer denied appeal for life


One of Port Arthur's most notorious convicted murderers will stay on death
row after a court denied his appeals Wednesday.

Elroy Chester, 37, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to death in 1998 for
the fatal shooting of Port Arthur firefighter Willie Ryman. Ryman was
killed when he tried to stop Chester from raping his two nieces. Chester
also confessed to killing at least 4 other people during a 6-month crime
spree in the Pear Ridge area of Port Arthur.

But in 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the mentally retarded could
not be executed, and Chester was one of Texas' death row inmates whose
mental capacity had not been determined at the time of the death sentence.

Wednesday the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that Chester is not
mentally retarded and still faces execution.

"We are very pleased with the result of the hearing and think it is
appropriate. Elroy Chester is one of the most dangerous individuals we
have ever prosecuted," Wayln Thompson, Jefferson County assistant district
attorney on the case said in a telephone interview Wednesday. "If he did
not qualify for the death penalty, then I don't know who does."

Thompson said that nothing in Chesters background tests indicated mental
retardation.

"By the findings presented in court, it was obvious by his adaptive
behavior that he was not mentally retarded. You have to look at more than
IQ scores, but at his behavior indicators. He functions normally and was
never diagnosed as mentally retarded, but only that he was learning
disabled, which is not the same thing at all," Thompson said.

One of Chester's IQ tests when he was a student in Port Arthur public
schools did show that he was mildly mentally retarded, but another test
also showed him with an IQ above 70, considered the threshold for
retardation. When he was 18 and in prison for 3 burglary convictions, a
Texas Department of Corrections test put his IQ at 69.

While finding evidence of "subaverage intellectual functioning
persuasive," the appeals court noted Chester did not show any deficits in
his adaptive behavior, which the judges acknowledged while "inherently
subjective (in) nature, is consistently the most problematic issue for
factfinders to resolve when dealing with these types of claims," according
to an Associated Press story on the hearing.

"The Supreme Court really never gave solid guidelines (on determining
mental retardation), and the court of Criminal Appeals has been struggling
with that," Thompson said.

The court specifically pointed to Chester's actions when he offered to
lead Port Arthur police to the gun used in his crimes. When police, acting
on his directions, couldn't find a gun he insisted was unloaded and hidden
in a hole in a ceiling, he took his handcuffed and shackled hands in an
opposite direction in the hole and attempted to pull out a gun officers
found was fully loaded.

Chester also confessed to killing John Henry Sepeda, 78, during a
burglary; Etta Mae Stallings, 87, in another burglary; Cheryl DeLeon, 40,
whom he stalked and fatally beat with his gun as she arrived home from
work; and Albert Bolden Jr., 35, who was his brother-in-law and was shot
in the head. According to court documents, Chester told police he killed
Bolden for beating his sister or for setting him up with a date with a
woman who turned out to be a transvestite.

Chester likely still has federal appeals he can pursue to try to keep him
from lethal injection. He does not have an execution date.

Thompson added that he believes Chester had very good legal representation
for the appeals hearing.

"An experienced firm from Alaska, Harvard educated, came down to represent
him on their own tab. They fought for what they believed in, and made sure
he had the best representation possible," Thompson said.

In 2 other similar cases the Austin-based appeals court on Wednesday said
condemned inmates Demetrius Lott Simms and Darrell Glenn Carr, convicted
in separate Houston slayings, are mentally retarded and may not be
executed. The decision upholds findings in each of their trial courts.
Their sentences now are reduced to life in prison.

*************************

Court says death row inmate is not mentally retarded


A convicted murderer condemned for fatally shooting a Port Arthur fireman
9 years ago lost an attempt to avoid execution when the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals ruled Wednesday that he is not mentally retarded.P> Elroy
Chester, 37, confessed to the slayings of at least four other people
during a 6-month crime spree. He pleaded guilty to killing Wilie Ryman
III, who was trying to keep Chester from raping his two nieces at their
Port Arthur home. Ryman, who frequently checked on the girls when their
mother was at work, had interrupted Chester's burglary of the home and the
rapes.

A Jefferson County jury in 1998 took just 12 minutes to decide Chester
should be executed.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 2002 barred the execution of mentally retarded
people, and a federal judge that year ruled that the trial court never
determined whether Chester is retarded. A federal appeals court in 2003
refused to rule on Chester's appeal until all state appeals were
exhausted.

In 2 other cases, however, the state's highest criminal appeals court
Wednesday said condemned inmates Demetrius Lott Simms and Darrell Glenn
Carr, convicted in separate Houston slayings, are mentally retarded and
cannot be executed. The decision upholds findings in their trial courts.
Their sentences now are reduced to life in prison.

Carr, 37, was convicted of killing a 16-year-old pregnant girl, Priscilla
Rangel, during a convenience store robbery in Houston in 1991. She was a
customer in the store. At the time, Carr was on parole after serving less
than 5 years of a 15-year sentence for assault.

Simms, who turned 36 on Tuesday, was convicted of abducting a 3-year-old
Houston girl, Monique Miller, raping her and then beating her to death
with a tree branch. He was arrested 3 days later while trying to abduct
another child. The slaying occurred 3 days after Simms was paroled after
serving less than 2 years of a 6-year sentence for theft and indecency
with a child.

In Chester's case, his trial court, after an evidentiary hearing, ruled
that his mental retardation claims had not been proved. That finding was
appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Chester's lawyers argued that
an improper standard was used to determine that Chester is not mentally
retarded.

Chester was on mandatory supervision, a form of probation, when he went on
the crime spree in which he killed 5 people, sexually assaulted two and
burglarized at least 5 homes. Court records show he also fired shots at at
least 5 other people.

(source: Associated Press)

********************

DNA is focus of plea deal ---- Murder suspect may forgo future testing to
avoid death penalty


At a time when the careful preservation of DNA evidence is credited with
helping free a dozen Dallas County men from wrongful convictions,
prosecutors asked a capital murder suspect to agree to destroy DNA
evidence in his case as a condition of a plea bargain.

Under the agreement, the man would plead guilty to life without parole and
in exchange avoid a death penalty trial. As part of the deal, the
defendant either would agree to waive future DNA challenges or agree to
have the existing DNA evidence destroyed.

Officials with the district attorney's office say the deal is an
extraordinary and isolated case. District Attorney Craig Watkins said his
office's stance on this case does not affect his vocal position supporting
the ability of convicts to get DNA tests because the evidence against Paul
Emilien is so overwhelming.

Mr. Emilien is charged with the October 2005 robbery and slaying of
19-year-old Anthony Flanery, a clerk at a Lancaster 7-Eleven store.

"It has nothing to do with innocence. The guy's guilty," Mr. Watkins said.
"We have him on video, and we've already done a DNA test. If the victims
are willing to forgo the death penalty, we're going to do whatever we can
to keep this from hanging over their heads in the future."

DNA tests that have already been conducted and other evidence link the man
to the slaying, and Assistant District Attorney Eric Mountin said
prosecutors are only trying to prevent a frivolous appeal years from now.

"As far as I'm concerned, I'm very comfortable and confident that the
position I'm taking is not only justified but is the right thing to do,"
Mr. Mountin said. "I don't think it's an illegitimate use of a waiver
under these circumstances."

Mr. Emilien's fingerprints were recovered on the store's cash register,
and the store's surveillance camera captured his image during the robbery.
The video shows a person firing at Mr. Flanery as he opens the cash
register. Mr. Emilien and 2 co-defendants also gave statements to police
about the robbery. And DNA evidence links Mr. Emilien to the scene.

Mr. Mountin said the district attorney's office is trying to be respectful
of the wishes of Mr. Flanery's family, who have agreed to avoid a death
penalty trial if Mr. Emilien is sentenced to life in prison without the
possibility of parole.

Mr. Emilien's attorneys have seen all the evidence against their client,
and that's why they approached prosecutors with the plea deal, Mr. Mountin
said.

"There's no secrets," he said. "It's not like I'm keeping something back
from the defense. That's why the defense wants to plead, because there is
so much evidence."

Ed King, one of Mr. Emilien's three attorneys, said DNA evidence in his
client's case does not play the same kind of role as DNA evidence in a
sexual assault case, where the identification of someone else's DNA can
prove that someone else committed the crime.

In Mr. Emilien's case, dried blood found on Mr. Emilien's clothing has
been linked to the victim.

"It's not giving up anything," Mr. King said.

The possibility that the plea deal might require that DNA evidence be
destroyed became a hot topic among the legal community after a Dallas
County prosecutor asked for advice on how to structure such a deal on an
Internet user group for Texas prosecutors.

State law allows such plea deal agreements, although it is ultimately up
to the judge presiding over the case whether to accept the terms of the
deal, said University of Texas law professor George Dix.

If the deal is accepted, Mr. Emilien would be the first person in Dallas
County to be sentenced to life without parole.

Since 2001, 12 Dallas County men have had their felony convictions
overturned after obtaining DNA tests that were not available at the time
of their convictions. The law that allows for post-conviction testing
hinges on authorities being able to find DNA evidence from the old cases.

The majority of the recent exonerations involved convictions from the
1980s in which DNA testing was either not available or the testing
procedures were not as accurate as they are today.

Robert Kepple, executive director of the Texas District and County
Attorneys Association, said prosecutors today make sure DNA testing is
made available to defendants. Dallas County has had more DNA exonerations
than any other jurisdiction in the United States, and Mr. Kepple said
prosecutors are "painfully aware of what's going on and the [aspersions]
cast upon their office as a result."

"Today is much different than 10 to 15 years ago," he said.

(source: Dallas Morning News)
Rick Halperin
2007-03-06 05:56:39 UTC
Permalink
March 5



TEXAS----impending execution(s)

Prison gang chief linked to about 15 killings to die Tuesday


A Texas prisoner is set to die Tuesday for a 2 1994 murders during what
authorities called an internal power struggle within the Mexican Mafia, a
notoriously violent prison gang that took its extensive presence outside
Texas prison walls.

Robert Perez, 48, rose in the military structure of the organization to
the top ranks of general.

Besides the fatal shootings of Jose Travieso and James Rivas, evidence at
his capital murder trial tied Perez to another 15 or so killings,
including a gangland-style execution of 5 people in 1997.

Perez would be the 7th Texas inmate to receive lethal injection this year
in the United States' busiest capital punishment state and the 1st of 2
facing execution this week. Joseph Nichols, convicted of killing a
convenience store clerk more than 26 years ago, is scheduled to die
Wednesday.

The U.S. Supreme Court in October refused to review Perez's case. A
federal judge in Houston last week dismissed a lawsuit that tried to stop
the execution by challenging the Texas lethal injection procedures as
unconstitutional. His lawyer said no additional appeals were planned.

"It's pretty hopeless," Don Vernay said.

Perez, a father of 8, declined to speak with reporters in the weeks
preceding his execution date.

He first went to prison in 1987 on a 10-year term for stabbing a man
numerous times in the heart and stomach. He was paroled in 1990 and had
the parole revoked 2 years later. He was out after only three months,
released in 1992 on mandatory supervision, a form of probation.

Soon after, he became a much more prominent figure in the gang.

Heriberto "Herbie" Huerta, president and a founder of the Mexican Mafia in
Texas, was convicted in 1994 on racketeering charges and sentenced to life
in a federal prison, leaving a split in the group he'd established 10
years earlier while imprisoned for murder conspiracy and racketeering. The
gang was intended to provide protection for Hispanics in Texas prisons.

One faction lined up with Perez, who while out of prison still maintained
allegiance to Huerta. Another faction was led by Luis "Blue" Adames.

According to trial testimony, Perez and 2 companions spotted Adames' car
at a San Antonio public housing project in 1994, went home to get weapons
and returned intending to kill him. Adames wasn't there, but his
supporters were and the men all exchanged gunfire.

Killed were Rivas, 27, and Travieso, 34, who'd been in a wheelchair as a
result of wounds from a previous shooting. It wouldn't be until 1997 that
Perez was indicted for their slayings. The following year, Perez was among
about a dozen Mexican Mafia members charged with racketeering and
involvement in more than a dozen murders.

His capital murder trial, moved from San Antonio to Dallas because of
publicity in his hometown, began in 1999, a month after he was convicted
in the federal case where he faced a life sentence without parole.

David Bires, one of Perez's trial lawyers, who described Perez as "an
absolute gentleman," recalled last week how he urged jurors to spare
Perez's life because Perez already was headed to a maximum security
federal lockup and never would get out. Prosecutors countered by showing
jurors scenes of other gang murders carried out at Perez's orders, they
said.

"Absolutely gruesome," Bires said. "Some of the most horrendous evidence
I've ever seen in 36 years practice of law."

Prosecutor Mary Green said among her witnesses was an informant who had
served as Perez's triggerman.

"Beaver would say: 'Get rid of so and so.' And this guy would do it," she
said.

Travieso's nephew, who was at the 1994 shooting scene and survived,
testified against Perez, as did Perez's 2 companions. The jury decided
Perez, who didn't testify, should die.

ON THE NET ---- Robert Perez http://www.deathrow-usa.us/RobertPerez.htm

Texas Department of Criminal Justice execution schedule
http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/stat/scheduledexecutions.htm

********************************************

Jessica deserves better law than HB 8-----How many more people would be
reluctant to turn in a family member or friend if it meant death row?


We should honor the memory of Jessica Lunsford with more than flawed
legislation.

The House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence met last week to hear
proposed bills, among them HB 8, Jessica's Law, introduced by Rep. Debbie
Riddle, R-Houston.

In 2005, 9-year-old Jessica was raped, kept captive for days and then
buried alive. When her body was unearthed, her hands were bound, but she
still managed to wiggle one finger free of the plastic that enclosed her.
John Evander Couey, her neighbor and a convicted sex offender, later
confessed and was convicted of her rape and murder.

Thus began the crusade of Jessica's Law to "fight to change legislation,
provide a grassroots awareness and continuous support base and search,
locate and help law enforcement apprehend absconder pedophiles." However,
the law proposed by Rep. Riddle is a hideous alteration of Jessica's Law
as it was meant to be.

The bill introduced by Rep. Riddle has 4 major propositions. First, it
proposes to change the statute of limitations from 10 to 20 years after
the 18th birthday, and would make a 1st sex offense a 1st-degree felony.
Second, HB 8 proposes to deny parole to anyone who commits a sexually
violent offense on a victim 13 years or younger. Third, it requires GPS
monitoring of civil offenders.

So far, so good, but it is the fourth proposition that strikes wide of the
mark: HB 8 proposes to make a second conviction for a sex crime against a
person under 14 years a capital felony, resulting in either life
imprisonment or the death penalty.

There is a thin line between deterrence and helping victims and outright
vengeance. There is also a thin line between justice and going too far.
Rep. Riddle has crossed the line on both accounts.

Does the death penalty truly help victims? Private citizens and former
victims are replying with a resounding no.

Most sex offenders commit their crimes against children of family members
or friends. Victims already feel a tremendous amount of guilt. How much
would that guilt be magnified if a child were put in the position of
having caused the family member or friend to suffer the death penalty? How
many more people would be more reluctant to turn in a family member or
friend if it meant death row?

Numerous prosecutors have also voiced a concern. A case that seeks the
death penalty must have irrefutable evidence. If a child is emotionally
traumatized to the point where he or she cannot testify, prosecutors often
attempt to compromise with the defendant for a lesser charge.

Sometimes, that is the best they can do with the evidence given. Without
this wiggle room, it would be all or nothing. Children who are emotionally
unable to testify could see their perpetrators go free.

At last week's hearing, Rep. Harold Dutton, D-Harris, exp-ressed concern
over whether the "death or life imprisonment" clause of HB 8 would give
sex criminals an incentive to kill their victims. The penalty would be
essentially the same whether they did or not, and a dead victim leaves no
witnesses.

Rep. Allen Vaught, D-Dallas, voiced that imposing the death penalty for a
crime in which the victim's life is not taken brings up issue with
constituional rights. In Coker v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that
the death penalty was a "grossly disproportionate and excessive"
consequence for the rape of an adult woman. When confronted with this,
Rep. Riddle stated that Coker v. Georgia concerned adult women, and HB 8
concerns children.

Regardless, the Supreme Court has not clarified its decision regarding the
death penalty for the rape of children. Thus, HB 8 risks being declared
unconstitutional. Because of the legislation's last proposition, the
entire bill could be kicked out, and the 3 other propositions that
actually help victims and deter sexually violent crimes would be rendered
invalid.

Proposition 4 of HB 8 makes the entire bill invalid. It is a bill that, as
written now, is more political sport than actual results. Some
representatives are sticking so stubbornly to the original bill that it's
creating so much controversy that it is unlikely to be passed at all.

Jessica deserves better. Will the State of Texas deny that? Today, the
House will vote on the bill. Let's hope they get the message that Jessica
deserves better.

(source: Brenda Tso is a government and philosophy senior; UT Daily Texan)

************************

House passes its version of 'Jessica's Laws' bill


The death sentence for habitual child predators and harsher penalties for
first-time offenders won tentative approval in the House on Monday after
lawmakers spent all weekend trying to fix a politically popular bill in
peril.

The measure would remove the statute of limitations from most sex offenses
against children and create a new felony crime in Texas, continuous abuse
of a child, defined as at least two offenses over at least 30 days.

A first conviction would bring a mandatory 25-year prison sentence. A 2nd
conviction would result in a capital charge, which carries life in prison
or the death penalty.

The bill was approved 118-23. After a final approval, expected Tuesday, it
goes to the Senate, which is expected to pass its own version. Lawmakers
would then negotiate the differences.

The bill is a top priority for state leaders, including Gov. Rick Perry
and Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst.

House Democrats expressed concern about the death penalty provision,
saying fewer children might report abuse by a relative or friend if that
person could be executed. But attempts to strip out the death penalty or
make it optional were overwhelmingly rebuffed.

TAKING SIDES

The arguments for and against "Jessica's Law":

Proponents say:

Longer sentences with no possibility of parole and sentencing repeat
child sex offenders to death will prevent a large number of sex crimes.

Increasing the statute of limitations for sexual crimes against children
will aid prosecutors by allowing children to speak up after they have
become adults.

Opponents say:

Tougher penalties could make juries more hesitant to convict sex
offenders and might prompt sex offenders to kill their victims to
eliminate witnesses.

The possibility of the death penalty might make those abused by family
members less likely to report the crime and testify in a capital case.

(source: Dallas Morning News)

*****************************

Condemned inmate in double slaying in Dallas loses appeal


Condemned inmate Joseph Lave, convicted in a 1992 case where 2 employees
of a suburban Dallas sporting goods store were killed in a robbery, lost
an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court when justices on Monday refused to
review his case.

Lave was convicted of capital murder for the slaying of an 18-year-old
employee at the Richardson store where another employee was killed and a
third wounded.

The decision from the high court would appear to move him a step closer to
execution.

"I don't want to comment on what's next," Lave's lawyer, Walter Long,
said, saying only that he wasn't surprised with the decision and that he
hoped to discuss the case with prosecutors. "We have some things they
might want to pursue with us."

Lave, who grew up in Houston and worked as a parcel delivery truck driver,
does not have an execution date.

Lave, now 42, was convicted under the Texas law of parties for being
involved when Justin Marquart was killed during the robbery of a Herman's
Sporting Goods store in Richardson on Thanksgiving eve in 1992. Another
18-year-old, Frederick Banzhaf, also was killed, and Lave received a life
prison term for that murder before he was tried for the Marquart slaying.
A 3rd employee, Angela King, the store's assistant manager, was attacked
and testified against Lave.

All 3 were beaten with a hammer and had their throats cut. King, however,
was able to call 911 and identify 1 of her 3 attackers as James Langston.

Langston was shot and killed when he tried to run over police trying to
arrest him. Inside his shoe, they found a card with the name of one of his
accomplices, Timothy Bates. After his arrest, Bates identified Lave as the
3rd person involved in the robbery.

When police searched Lave's car and apartment, they found some loot from
the robbery. Authorities said $2,950 in cash, 21 rifles and shotguns and
athletic clothing were taken. Lave surrendered to police 2 days later
after he rented a Cadillac and drove to New Orleans, where he was told by
a friend that he was a suspect in the Richardson slayings.

In his appeal, Lave, who did not testify at his capital murder trial,
challenged the testimony of a police officer who was told by Bates that
Lave killed Marquart.

Lave's appeal argued his lawyers should have had the opportunity to
question Bates, who they said was pressured and misled by police into
shifting blame to Lave. But according to records in the 5th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals, which earlier turned down Lave's appeal, Lave and his
trial lawyer agreed with prosecutors at the trial that Bates would not be
called as a witness.

In an earlier unsuccessful appeal, Lave pointed to the agreement in his
argument that his trial lawyer was ineffective.

(source for both: Associated Press)

*********************

Fort Bend man found guilty of capital murder


Bart Whitaker was found guilty today on a charge of capital murder by a
Fort Bend County jury in the slayings of his mother and brother who were
gunned down in their Sugar Land home.

The punishment phase of the trial is expected to start Tuesday and
prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.

The verdict was read by state District Judge Cliff Vacek after the jury
deliberated two hours and 25 minutes.

Patricia Whitaker, 51, and Kevin Whitaker, 19, were each killed by single
9 mm gunshots in an ambush. Bart's father, Kent Whitaker, 57, was wounded,
as was Bart.

Co-defendant Steve Champagne, 24, testified earlier that Bart's wound was
a ploy to make it look like he was a victim, too. The ruse was intended to
make police think a burglar had shot the family.

A third defendant, accused triggerman Chris Brashear, 24, will be tried
separately. Champagne, the getaway driver, has accepted a 15-year prison
sentence in exchange for his testimony.

The trial started Feb. 26 with Kent Whitaker telling jurors he believed
his son was guilty in the slayings.

3 witnesses in the trial have testified that Bart wanted to kill his
family so he could inherit the family estate valued at more than $1
million. The jury also heard details of two aborted plots to kill the
family.

Testimony in the trial ended with Fort Bend County prosecutors calling the
state's final 4 witnesses to the stand Friday. The defense rested without
calling any witnesses.

(source: Houston Chronicle)

*******************************

New Prosecutor Revisits Justice in Dallas----District Attorney Embraces
Innocence Project and 'Smart on Crime' Approach


Craig Watkins is still settling into his 11th-floor office overlooking the
city skyline, hanging up pictures, arranging his plaques -- and
revolutionizing the criminal justice system he oversees.

Sworn in as Dallas County district attorney on Jan. 1 -- he is the first
elected black district attorney in Texas -- Watkins fired or accepted the
resignations of almost two dozen high-level white prosecutors and began
hiring minorities and women.

And in an unprecedented act for any jurisdiction in the nation, he
announced he would allow the Texas affiliate of the Innocence Project to
review hundreds of Dallas County cases dating back to 1970 to decide
whether DNA tests should be conducted to validate past convictions. At 12
in the past 5 years, Dallas has more post-conviction DNA exonerations than
any county in the nation and more than at least 2 states. A 13th
exoneration, of a Dallas County man, is expected to be announced within
days.

By his own estimate, Watkins should not be occupying what he calls a
"10-gallon-hat, cowboy-boot-wearing, dip-chewin',
lock-'em-up-and-throw-away-the-key" post in the 9th-largest city in the
country.

He's black, he's a Democrat, he's young, he was a defense lawyer with an
office in a southside neighborhood, and he has no prosecutorial experience
-- unless he counts a year-long internship handling misdemeanors in the
city prosecutor's office. His 2 previous applications to work as an
assistant district attorney in Dallas County were rejected, in fact, by an
office in which a prosecutor once produced a manual on how to exclude
minorities from Texas juries.

In November, Watkins, 39, was elected as part of a Democratic sweep in
Dallas in which the party took 42 judgeships and 6 other countywide
offices. He is the 1st Democratic district attorney in 20 years. During
the campaign he promised to be "smart on crime," not just tough on crime;
to ask for the death penalty when appropriate but also to advocate for
better rehabilitation programs and post-release support services for
ex-convicts.

"You know what people call it? 'Hug-a-thug,' " said Watkins, imposing at 6
feet 5 yet soft-spoken, as he sat in his office after his latest "guest of
honor" appearance, at a local high school's Black History Month assembly.
"People say I'll coddle these criminals. But it's not about coddling
criminals; it's about being smart."

That, he believes, means ensuring that the right people are behind bars.

Post-conviction DNA analysis in certain cases has been allowed in Texas
since 2001. Since then, 354 people convicted in Dallas County -- most were
in prison, but some were on parole or probation or were done with their
sentences -- have asked for the DNA testing. The Dallas district
attorney's office agreed to 19 requests; trial judges, who reviewed the
district attorney's recommendations, ultimately granted the requests of 34
people.

That, said Watkins, tells him a "get a conviction at all costs" approach
"utterly failed us."

"The question becomes: Do you stand in the way of justice or do you be the
wind behind it to make sure that justice gets done?" Watkins said. "We're
not being soft on crime. We're being sure we get the right person going to
jail."

Most of the exonerations date to cases tried in the 1980s under Dallas's
legendary law-and-order district attorney, Henry Wade. Attempts to reach
Watkins's predecessor, Bill Hill, were unsuccessful.

This time, the screenings of cases to determine whether they are eligible
for post-conviction DNA testing will be done by Texas Weslayan University
School of Law students. They will work under Mike Ware, an adjunct law
professor and board member of the Innocence Project of Texas, who believes
that prosecutors and judges may have previously taken an overly stringent
view of the Texas statute and denied testing that might have led to
exoneration.

"I have to respect [Watkins's] willingness to certainly take his oath of
office to heart and be dedicated to true justice, which is what his oath
of office requires," Ware said.

(source: Washington Post)

**********************

Supreme Court Denies Appeal Of Texas death row Inmate


A Texas death-row inmate won't get a hearing of his appeal to the US
Supreme Court.

The justices Monday let stand Joseph Lave's death sentence for the 1992
killing of a suburban Dallas sporting goods store worker during a robbery.

Lave was convicted of capital murder for the slaying of 18-year-old Justin
Marquart at Herman's Sporting Goods in Richardson the day before
Thanksgiving 1992.

Before that, he was sentenced to life imprisonment for the slaying of
Marquart's 18-year-old co-worker, Frederick Banzhaf.

A 3rd worker, Angela King, also was wounded in the robbery.

All 3 were beaten with a hammer and had their throats cut. King, however,
was able to call 911 and identify 1 of her 3 attackers as James Langston.

Langston tried to run over police trying to arrest him and was shot and
killed.

But inside his shoe, police found a card with the name of one of his
accomplices, Timothy Bates.

Bates, after his arrest, identified Lave as the third person involved in
the robbery.

Lave, who grew up in Houston and worked as a parcel delivery truck driver,
doesn't have an execution date yet.

(source: KWTX)





*******************************

Predator law costs disputed----Critics challenge low estimate for state's
tougher child-sex penalties


Under the politically popular sex offender penalties known as "Jessica's
Laws," California will spend nearly $130 million next year tracking child
predators. Florida will shell out close to $12 million. Louisiana, the 1st
state to sentence a child sex predator to death, will spend $1 million.

But the version of Jessica's Law up for a vote in the Texas House today
will cost Texans next to nothing for at least 5 years, according to
financial reports prepared by legislative budget analysts.

Critics say that's impossible. Rep. Debbie Riddle's bill - which
authorizes the death penalty or life without parole for repeat child sex
offenders, increases sentences for certain first-time child sex offenders
and prohibits early release from prison or parole for violent child sex
offenders - would require more money for prison beds and corrections
guards, they argue.

And a Dallas Morning News analysis of states with Jessica's Laws similar
to those Texas is considering found that almost all of them had to set
aside millions of dollars immediately to follow through on their
legislation.

But proponents of the bill and the fiscal analysts who crafted the
estimate note that the statute won't apply to many offenders; it's written
to catch "the worst of the worst," and only those inmates will be serving
lifetime prison sentences. Plus, a major expansion of global positioning
systems, a costly tracking component of most states' Jessica's Laws, isn't
included in the current House bill.

"All I can tell you is, the fiscal note on this has come back that it
basically doesn't have an impact," said Ms. Riddle, R-Tomball, referring
to the analysis conducted by the Legislative Budget Board. "At this point
I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary."

That estimate "is laughable," said Steve Hall, whose StandDown Texas
Project advocates a moratorium on the death penalty.

"When you look at Texas, with a larger population than most of these
states, with severe penalties for sex offenders, it is inconceivable that
you're not going to see increased costs in this state," he said. "It
certainly makes you wonder if they were too rushed to do a thorough job or
if politics intruded."

The original Jessica's Laws - which generally impose 25-year mandatory
minimum sentences for child sex predators, require lifetime electronic
monitoring and create 2,000-foot safety zones around parks and schools -
passed in Florida in 2005 after the sexual assault and slaying of
9-year-old Jessica Lunsford. The man on trial in the case is a convicted
sex offender.

So far, more than 20 states have implemented versions of the laws, and
Florida, Montana, Louisiana, Oklahoma and South Carolina have given
prosecutors the go-ahead to seek the death penalty for repeat child sex
predators. It's unclear whether the punishment is constitutional; the U.S.
Supreme Court has said that only crimes resulting in death can bring
execution, though advocates say the court might rule differently in a case
where the victim is a child.

Legal concerns

Last week, Texas lawmakers put the brakes on the fast-moving House bill
given emergency priority by Gov. Rick Perry, in part because of those
legal concerns. Ms. Riddle said she'll present amendments today to clarify
the death penalty provision and create a new offense of "continuous sexual
abuse of a child," one that would come with a mandatory 25-year minimum
sentence.

Officials with the Legislative Budget Board said they couldn't comment on
the differences between the estimated cost of Jessica's Law in Texas and
its cost in other states. They pointed to the text of their report, which
indicates there will be "no significant fiscal implication to the state"
for the first five years after the bill's passage.

After that, the report says, the law still will not be costly because it
will only affect a "small percentage of persons convicted of sexually
violent offenses." The provision in Ms. Riddle's bill that increases
penalties for 1st-time child sex offenders will have the greatest effect,
the analysts wrote - requiring another 489 prison beds by 2027. Because
that's more than 5 years out, they don't attach a dollar figure to the
fiscal note.

"We were actually surprised and encouraged it was that low," Jon English,
Ms. Riddle's chief of staff, said of the prison bed estimate.

The Senate version of the bill, which includes a 25-year minimum sentence
for 1st-time violent child molesters and some expansion of GPS monitoring,
hasn't reached the full Senate, so its financial analysis has not yet been
released.

Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, the chief champion for the Senate version, has
estimated that lifetime GPS monitoring would cost about $14 a day - just
over $5,000 a year per offender. And Don Forse, chief of staff for Sen.
Bob Deuell, the Greenville Republican who filed the Senate bill, said he
"wouldn't anticipate it being much different from the House version as far
as the fiscal implication goes."

In other states with similar Jessica's Laws, however, the cost has been
more immediate.

California's budget includes close to $130 million next fiscal year to
implement Jessica's Law, which includes GPS monitoring. The Florida
Legislature has budgeted $11.9 million annually, money to fund additional
prison beds, corrections officials and GPS monitoring devices.

And corrections officials in Wisconsin determined that their Jessica's
Laws - which impose stiff mandatory minimum sentences for violent
predators - would require nine new prisons over 25 years, at a cost of
more than $400 million. Nonetheless, the bill was approved.

A Tennessee version that included the death penalty and failed last year
would have cost the state an extra $14 million a year. That bill has been
reintroduced this year without a capital punishment provision.

Montana, which already has a death penalty provision but is considering
longer sentences and GPS tracking, estimates its costs will increase by
about $3 million annually.

These types of costs are logical, corrections experts say.

Longer sentences

Longer sentences mean that prisons already jampacked will need more beds
and have higher operating costs, and be responsible for medical care for
inmates aging in the system.

Currently, it costs $14,600 a year to incarcerate an inmate in Texas; a
25-year minimum sentence here would cost close to $365,000. More than
10,000 inmates are now serving sentences for violent sexual assault
against a child, and hundreds more have been given probation or deferred
adjudication. Texas' prison system is already at capacity, so the state
would have to either free other offenders or build new units.

Meanwhile, corrections experts say, the costs of trials and appeals in
death sentence and life imprisonment cases are staggering, sometimes
reaching $1 million per case. Executions themselves can cost upward of
$15,000.

"Lawmakers say, 'We're just changing the law - enacting a measure doesn't
cost us anything,' " said Tim Bray, a criminologist with the University of
Texas at Dallas. "But it's the impact that costs us money. All of the
money is tied up in the increased cost of incarceration."

(source: Dallas Morning News)
Rick Halperin
2007-03-07 06:53:22 UTC
Permalink
March 6




TEXAS----execution

Prison gang chief executed for 1994 S.A. slayings


A leader in a notorious prison gang who authorities said sanctioned more
than a dozen killings during an unprecedented wave of violence in San
Antonio in the 1990s was executed this evening for a double slaying in the
Alamo city.

Robert Perez greeted his wife, 2 sons and a brother with a big smile as
they entered the death chamber

"Tell all the kids I love them and never forget," he said in a brief final
statement. "Tell everybody I love them. Stay strong. Bye-bye."

After exchanging "love you" with his relatives, he remarked, "I got my
boots on like the cowboys."

Just before slipping into unconsciousness after the lethal dose began,
Perez said he could "taste it." 7 minutes later, at 6:17 p.m., he was
pronounced dead.

No friends or relatives of the victims chose to attend.

Perez, 48, rose to the rank of general in the military-structured Mexican
Mafia gang.

Perez already was headed for a federal life prison term on racketeering
and conspiracy convictions for a series of robberies, drug deals and
murders in San Antonio from 1994 through 1997 when he was tried on state
charges for the 1994 slayings of Jose Travieso and James Rivas.

Perez becomes the 7th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in
Texas and the 386th overall since the state resumed capital punishment on
December 7, 1982. Perez becomes the 147th condemned inmate to be put to
death since Rick Perry became Governor of Texas in 2001. At least 12 more
inmates have current execution dates in Texas, including Joseph Nichols,
who is due to be put to death tomorrow (Wednesday) night. A record 152
condemned inmates were put to death during the tenure of then-Governor
George W. Bush, but that number will be surpassed later this spring.

Perez becomes the 8th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in the
USA and the 1065th overall since the nation resumed executions on January
17, 1977.

(sources: Associated Press & Rick Halperin)

***************************

4 condemned inmates given new execution dates


The Texas Department of Corrections has announced 4 new execution
dates---Charles Nealy (March 20), Michael Griffith (June 6), Lionell
Rodriguez (June 20), Lonnie Johnson (July 24).

(sources: TDCJ & Rick Halperin)

*****************************

Legislators OK death for some pedophiles


Individuals found guilty twice under a new criminal offense called
"ongoing sexual abuse" of children could get the death penalty under a
bill tentatively approved Monday by the Texas House.

The bill, passing 118-23, targets pedophiles abusing children over an
extended period with the death penalty or life without parole, a narrower
use of capital punishment than a measure the House withdrew last week amid
concerns about its constitutionality.

In a symbolic slap at those who knew about alleged ongoing sexual abuse of
children incarcerated at Texas Youth Commission facilities, lawmakers
adopted stiffer penalties for a state employee who fails to report such
conduct by another state employee or officer.

They voted, 135-7, for an amendment by Rep. Jim Dunnam, D-Waco, creating a
second-degree felony for those who are aware of such abuse and fail to
report it.

The wording was accepted by authors of the bill but is expected to be
removed later.

Debate on the redrafted bill largely centered on the fairness of rules
under which a person could be prosecuted for ongoing sexual abuse of a
child or children under the age of 14.

A jury would not have to unanimously agree to the time, place or even the
occurrence of each separate offense alleged, under the proposal.

The jury would only have to unanimously agree that ongoing sexual abuse of
one or more children occurred for more than 30 days.

A 1st conviction under the new offense of "continual sexual abuse of a
child or children" would carry a minimum 25-year penalty to life with
parole, meaning the death penalty could not be used under the proposed law
for at least a quarter century.

A 2nd conviction would be a capital crime punishable by death or life
without parole.

The proposed law would apply to indecency with a child by contact, sexual
assault and aggravated sexual assault of a child, sexual performance by a
child and kidnapping or burglary if either was committed with the intent
to sexually abuse a child.

"This law gives more tools in a prosecutor's toolbox to allow them to go
after the true pedophiles in our society," said Rep. Dan Gattis,
R-Georgetown, sponsor of the measure.

The bill, as passed, would allay some concerns by including a "Romeo and
Juliet" clause so that teenage love affairs wouldn't result in a 25-year
minimum prison sentence.

It allows a defense if the accused is within five years of the age of the
victim. That means a 17-year-old could likely avoid conviction unless his
or her victim was age 11 or less, said Shannon Edmonds of the Texas
District and County Attorneys Association.

Gattis' measure replaces earlier wording in House Bill 8, the "Jessica's
Law" filed by Rep. Debbie Riddle, R-Tomball.

Both chambers are proposing bills this session, named after 9-year-old
murder victim Jessica Lunsford of Florida, which include the death penalty
among stiffer penalties for pedophiles.

"If you are so dense that you are convicted of this one time, and you come
back a 2nd time and we catch you on this offense, you will face the death
penalty," Gattis said.

Houston Democratic Rep. Harold Dutton failed in an attempt, sought by
defense lawyers, to require that juries unanimously agree on each alleged
offense in the ongoing sexual abuse of a child.

"A person who is charged with multiple offenses could end up in a
situation where the jury is not in agreement with each of those offenses.
The defendant is found guilty of just being a bad guy under your
scenario," he said.

No statute of limitations

Dutton, whose attempt to remove the death penalty provision and change it
to life without parole also failed, said the bill would allow a jury that
might not agree on every allegation to reach a verdict resulting in a
defendant being put to death.

"That will really distinguish us, members. Texas will be the leader in the
nation of having a criminal justice system that's just criminal," he said.

Rep. Jose Menendez, D-San Antonio, added an amendment that he said would
abolish the statute of limitations on child sex assault.

He said 28 states effectively have no statute of limitations for such
crimes. He said 1.9 million adult Texans have been sexually abused at some
time, and that many victims don't come to terms with the abuse until much
later in life.

In a related matter, Sen. Bob Deuell, R-Greenville, sponsor of "Jessica's
Law" in the upper chamber, is studying New York state legislation under
consideration to use GPS (global positioning system) monitoring on sex
offenders who complete their entire term.

The Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Express-News found that one in five
such sex offenders headed to Harris and Bexar counties in a recent
18-month period either failed to register as required or listed missing or
incomplete addresses as they left prison.

*****************

No shortage of blame for TYC's woes


Sometimes, state government works despite itself, but that obviously
hasn't been the case with the Texas Youth Commission.

By the time the widening scandal is resolved and that will be a long
while yet dozens of people in authority, including Gov. Rick Perry, TYC
officials and local prosecutors, may be sharing the blame for either
covering up or being too slow to pursue 2-year-old allegations that some
TYC staffers sexually abused delinquents in their custody.

Even the Legislature, from which the loudest cries of outrage are now
coming, may not be off the hook.

A bureaucratic problem

Officials who have violated the law or neglected their responsibility
deserve the sanctions and/or criticism coming their way. But also at the
heart of the TYC controversy is another basic problem, the structure of
state government, an often dysfunctional collection of agencies in which
the people supposedly in charge often aren't.

Elected oversight from a part-time Legislature and a constitutionally weak
governor is limited, leaving the bureaucracy to largely run itself in
this case with unsavory consequences.

The governor is ultimately responsible for his office's slow reaction to
the scandal. Although his staff learned last fall of a Texas Rangers
investigation into the allegations, Perry didn't take the first public
step to address the problem until last week, when he removed the chairman
of TYC's governing board. He acted after Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and the
Senate, responding to news reports, had focused attention on the problem.

The Legislature also can move slowly, partly because it is in regular
session for only five months every other year.

Crisis finally declared

During a Senate Criminal Justice Committee hearing on Aug. 30 in South
Texas, parents, guards and juvenile justice advocates testified that abuse
was widespread in TYC, especially at the unit in Edinburg, where there had
been a riot in 2004.

"What is it going to take to light a fire?" one advocate asked the
committee, according to the San Antonio Express-News, which covered the
meeting.

But Senate leaders, including Criminal Justice Committee Chairman John
Whitmire, D-Houston, didn't declare a crisis until last week.

The Legislature sets laws, approves agency budgets and screams when things
go wrong, and the governor appointed the TYC board.

But TYC and other citizen boards, which govern most state agencies, are
largely autonomous and more likely to be influenced by their professional
employees, who perform the daily work, than by the governor or the
Legislature.

Limited expertise on board

With few exceptions, board members are unpaid, meet only a handful of
times a year and are heavily dependent for information and influenced in
decision-making by their staffs.

Pete Alfaro, who resigned from the TYC board after Perry designated a new
chairman, is a retired engineer. The remaining board members include a
real estate executive, an environmental consultant, an oil company
executive, an attorney and 2 educators.

They were chosen because of their political or personal ties to the
governor or perhaps a desire for public service, not for expertise in
juvenile justice.

Maybe they actively participated in a cover-up. Or, maybe they smelled
smoke but were slow to react when the professionals whom they trusted said
there wasn't a fire.

Although the governor has little authority over the daily operation of
state agencies, he can fire his own appointees to state boards with the
approval of 2/3 of the Senate and replace them. All the TYC appointees are
Perry's.

This little-known constitutional provision, adopted in 1980, has never
been used so far, anyway.

Stronger elected oversight of state agencies would require changes in the
state constitution or laws that few legislators or taxpayers traditionally
have been interested in seeking.

In recent years, both Perry and Gov. Ann Richards asked the Legislature
for more direct control over the bureaucracy, through an executive-type
Cabinet of agency heads, but lawmakers gave the governor little additional
authority.

CHIP's political effects

Rep. Garnet Coleman, D-Houston, one of the Legislature's strongest
advocates for the Children's Health Insurance Program, thinks House
Republicans who want to undo some of the deep cuts they made to the
program in 2003 now realize they are out of step with most Texans and fear
voter retaliation.

He may be correct.

The CHIP cuts were a significant issue in a number of races in 2004 and
2006.

They were a factor in Democrat Hubert Vo's unseating of former Rep.
Talmadge Heflin, R-Houston, the former House Appropriations Committee
chairman, in 2004 and in Vo's successful defense against Heflin's comeback
bid last year.

They contributed to former Houston Rep. Martha Wong's loss to Democrat
Ellen Cohen in November and in former Republican Rep. Arlene Wohlgemuth's
2004 loss to Democratic U.S. Rep. Chet Edwards in a GOP congressional
district in Central Texas.

And they helped Democrats David Leibowitz, of San Antonio, and Mark
Strama, of Austin, unseat Republican incumbents in 2004.

According to a recent poll by Opinion Analysts Inc., for the
Democratic-leaning Texas Progress Council, two-thirds of Texans want to
"fully fund" CHIP.

Small wonder then, Coleman says, that Rep. John Davis, of Houston, a key
Republican on the Human Services Committee, is sponsoring House Bill 2049,
which would ease some of the restrictions imposed on CHIP in 2003,
contributing to thousands of children losing health coverage.

Among other things, the bill would restore the 12-month CHIP enrollment
period, which was cut to six months four years ago, and make it easier to
pass an assets test that disqualified many low-income families from
coverage.

Davis said the bill, supported by Speaker Tom Craddick, is the "right
thing to do." Was he speaking about policy or politics or both?

(source for both: Houston Chronicle)

*********************

State Seeks Death Penalty for Sugar Land Family Murders


The state is seeking the death penalty for Bart Whitaker for his role in a
murder plot against his family.

On Monday, a Fort Bend County jury Whitaker guilty of capital murder.

Prosecutors say Whitaker hired a gunman to murder his family so that he
could collect a million dollars in insurance money. Jurors will begin
deliberating a punishment on Tuesday.

During closing statements Monday morning, prosecutors told the jury that
Bart Whitaker killed his family for one reason: greed.

"Bart Whitaker thought he could get away with the perfect crime. He quite
simply wanted to kill his family so he could get inherit the Whitaker
family's $1.5 million estate. He wanted to kill his brother Kevin quite
simply because he didn't want to split the money with Kevin. He wanted all
the money for himself," prosecutor Jeff Strange said.

Randy McDonald, Whitaker's defense attorney, has not denied that his
client plotted the murder. During the defense's closing statements, the
defense attorney told jurors that Whitaker is guilty of killing his mother
and brother.

"No one has come in here and told you Bart Whitaker is not guilty. He
didn't even plead not guilty," McDonald said. "I'm the lawyer. I didn't
want to plead not guilty before you because I didn't ever want to tell you
anything that is false in this case."

Whitaker was found guilty of hiring his room mate to kill his family. On
Dec. 13, 2003, Whitaker lured his mother, father and brother away form
their Sugar Land home. After the family returned from dinner, the family,
including Bart Whitaker, was ambushed and shot. His mother and brother
died. His father survived.

Before resting Friday morning, prosecutors called the man who allegedly
helped Whitaker escape to Mexico after the murders.

Rogelio Rios turned Whitaker into police when he heard that Whitaker was
wanted in the murders.

The defense ended its case without calling any witnesses Friday.

Both sides rested before 11:30 a.m. Friday and the case was handed to the
jury at about 11:30 a.m. Monday.

(source: MyFoxHouston )

**********************

Prosecutors to seek death penalty in 2006 slaying----Police accused Selwyn
Davis of attacking 2 people before killing girlfriend's mother.


Police responded to Lara's apartment after neighbors called 911 to report
a possible burglary and stabbing. When Davis spotted the officers, he
retreated into Lara's apartment, left through a back window and fled the
scene in Lara's minivan, court documents say. Among 6 felony charges
pending against Davis is one for aggravated assault police said he
attempted to hit officers with Lara's minivan as he drove off. Davis was
later arrested a nearby shopping complex.

Compared with prosecutors in other large Texas counties, Travis County
District Attorney Ronnie Earle rarely seeks death sentences.

Prosecutor Judy Shipway made the announcement during a pretrial hearing
this afternoon in state District Judge Julie Kocurek's court. Kocurek
appointed defense lawyers Steve Brittain and Allan Williams to represent
Davis. The lawyers said they were too unfamiliar with the case to comment.
Kocurek said the case could go to trial as early as October.

If a jury convicts Davis of capital murder, jurors would then decide
whether to sentence him to life in prison or death.

A police affidavit said Davis's crime spree began on Aug. 21, 2006, when
he attacked his girlfriend, Linda Martinez, at an apartment they shared in
the Lafayette Landing apartments on Burton Road between Riverside Drive
and Oltorf Street. Davis punched, strangled and cut Martinez with a razor
blade, slicing her thigh, breaking her jaw and fracturing her eye socket,
the affidavit said.

Later that evening, Davis went to his aunt and uncle's house near East
Stassney Lane in South Austin and asked for a place to say, another police
affidavit said. When his uncle refused, Davis attacked him with a knife,
cutting him on both hands, his arm and his right cheek, the affidavit
said. Davis took money and a car keys and fled, the affidavit said.

It is unclear how much time elapsed between that incident and when Davis
is accused of going to Lara's apartment.

Currently, 1 other death penalty case is pending in Travis County. Milton
Dwayne Gobert could be sentenced to death if he is convicted of killing
his girlfriend's friend, Mel Cotton, in 2003 as Cotton's 5-year-old son
watched. The boy was stabbed but survived. That case is on hold while
prosecutors appeal a decision by state District Judge Bob Perkins to
suppress statements Gobert made to police after the killing.

For every capital murder case, Earle convenes a panel of his top deputies
to discuss the facts, then recommend whether to seek the death penalty.
Earle, who makes the final decision, could not be immediately reached for
comment this afternoon.

(source: Austin American-Statesman)

************************

2 kids shot at home die----Children attacked day before restraining order
against dad was issued

Elia Martinez-Bermudez's boyfriend threatened to kill her, their children
and then himself if she ever left him, the Irving woman said in an
affidavit she filed for a protective order against him in Dallas County on
Friday.

By the time a district court judge granted the temporary restraining order
Monday morning, the couple's children were already dead.

Police said Hector Medina shot 3-year-old Javier and 8-month-old Diana on
Sunday at a home in the 3100 block of Roanoke Drive before he turned the
gun on himself, less than a week after Ms. Martinez-Bermudez ended their
5-year relationship.

Javier and Diana were taken to Children's Medical Center Dallas on Sunday.
Diana died Sunday night. Javier died Monday morning. Mr. Medina was listed
in critical condition Monday at Parkland Memorial Hospital. Police said he
is facing charges of capital murder and could face the death penalty if
convicted.

In court papers filed Friday, Ms. Martinez-Bermudez said that she had left
Mr. Medina earlier that week.

"I am afraid for my safety due to Hector's unpredictable behavior and past
threats to harm me and my children," Ms. Martinez-Bermudez said in a sworn
affidavit.

On Monday, Irving police said they were still investigating the events
that led to Sunday's shootings. Officer David Tull said that although
investigators were aware the couple had had problems, they saw nothing
that would lead to such violence.

"The marital problems they've been having, from what we've gathered, are
not major," Officer Tull said.

Neighbor Gerardo Estrada said he would sometimes say hello to the
residents of the house, but he didn't know them. He said there have been
no problems in the neighborhood since he's lived there.

"It's quiet," said Mr. Estrada, who recently moved into the neighborhood
from Pleasant Grove. "Simple. Nice."

But in the court documents, Ms. Martinez-Bermudez described the
relationship as riddled with a series of sexual and physical assaults and
threats.

"In the past, Hector has grabbed me, thrown me, pulled my hair and pinned
me down and forced me to have sex with him numerous times," she said.

According to the papers, Mr. Medina told Ms. Martinez-Bermudez that if she
tried to tell police, they would not believe her and that if she tried to
leave him, "he would kill me and both our children and then himself."

Irving police did not return phone calls Monday afternoon after The Dallas
Morning News obtained copies of Ms. Martinez-Bermudez's affidavit. Ms.
Martinez-Bermudez could not be reached for comment.

Police said they were called to the home the couple shared with another
family last week, but an offense report was not filed, indicating no
crimes had been committed. In her affidavit, Ms. Martinez-Bermudez
indicated that the next day Mr. Medina assaulted her because she had
refused to have sex with him.

"He told me since I had called the police the day before for him
destroying my belongings and the police had not been able to help me, they
would give me a ticket for bothering them so much," she said. "Hector
stated since I did not have any bruising they would not believe me. I
believed Hector, so I did not call for help."

Police tape surrounded the home Monday and blood could be seen on the
front sidewalk. A tricycle, child's bicycle and Spider-Man scooter were
outside. Neighbor Salvador Ramirez said that about 5 p.m. Sunday he saw
Mr. Medina in the front yard with Diana on his knee. Later that day, he
heard gunshots and ran to the home to find Mr. Medina on the sidewalk,
bleeding from his neck.

Meanwhile, the children were inside with gunshot wounds. Mr. Ramirez said
Ms. Martinez-Bermudez returned home after police had arrived.

According to police and neighbors, Ms. Martinez-Bermudez was running
errands when the shootings took place. It was unclear whether she knew
that Mr. Medina was with the children.

Mr. Ramirez said police did not enter the house to check on the children
until he and his wife insisted on it through a Spanish-speaking officer.

In her affidavit, Ms. Martinez-Bermudez said she was afraid how Mr. Medina
would react to her decision to leave him.

"I believe his violence against me will continue and escalate if I do not
receive protection," she said in the affidavit.

(source: Dallas Morning News)
Rick Halperin
2007-03-08 02:55:15 UTC
Permalink
March 7



TEXAS----execution

2nd Texas inmate in as many days executed


More than a quarter-century after he and a buddy walked into a Houston
convenience store to hold up the place, Joseph Nichols was executed this
evening for the fatal shooting of the 70-year-old store clerk.

Asked by the warden if he had a final statement, Nichols adamantly said,
"Yes, Yes I do."

Then he referred to a supervisory corrections officer on death row by name
and uttered a string of obscenities about her.

"That's all I got to say," he said.

He winked toward where his parents and 3 brothers watched. He was
pronounced dead at 6:19 p.m., 7 minutes after the lethal dose began.

Nichols, 45, and a longtime friend, Willie Ray Williams, were both
convicted and condemned for the Oct. 13, 1980, slaying of Claude Shaffer.
Williams pleaded guilty and was executed in 1995.

Nichols' appeals and protests from death penalty opponents have focused on
the fact that one bullet wound killed Shaffer and that Williams was
prosecuted and convicted of being the shooter. They noted that Nichols,
who said he'd fled the store when the fatal shot was fired, also was
labeled as the shooter by Harris County district attorneys who prosecuted
the case.

"1 bullet and 2 shooters," said Nichols' lawyer, J. Clifford Gunter III.
"There's no getting around that."

Prosecutors defended Nichols' conviction, saying Texas' law of parties
makes non-triggermen just as culpable in crimes like Shaffer's murder.

Gunter took the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, which previously had
rejected Nichols' appeals. Gunter argued, however, that the court had
rejected piecemeal appeals and needed to delay the punishment to look at
"cumulative errors," saying Nichols had been deprived "of a complete and
meaningful post-conviction review of his case."

But about 90 minutes before Nichols was scheduled to die, the high court
turned down his appeal. The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles earlier
this week rejected a commutation request.

Nichols was tried twice. At his first trial, jurors were unable to agree
on the death penalty and a mistrial was declared. Nichols missed by 30
days a change in Texas law that would have given him an automatic life
term if jurors were unable to agree on a death sentence.

It's the 2nd trial that Nichols' lawyers are accusing prosecutors of
changing tactics, suppressing evidence and arguing he was the shooter so
jurors would be more inclined to decide on a death sentence, which they
did.

"They had a parties charge (to the jury)," said Roe Wilson, who handles
capital case appeals for the Harris County District Attorney's Office,
denying any improper manipulations of evidence. "They were told the
prosecution thought Nichols was the shooter, but there was no ballistics
evidence."

Both Nichols and Williams told police they shot toward Shaffer, and jurors
heard testimony from a girlfriend of one of the shooters that when Nichols
returned to their car outside the store, he said he thought he shot the
victim in the chest.

"They knew both people said: 'I shot toward him,'" Wilson said, referring
to the jury. "And even if Nichols wasn't actually the one who hit him,
under the law of parties Nichols was still guilty."

The fatal bullet could not be recovered for ballistics tests.

"I never denied being there," Nichols said recently from death row. "I'm
not telling you I'm not guilty of anything."

But he insisted that when Williams fired the fatal shot, "I had already
left."

Nichols dropped out of high school when his girlfriend became pregnant,
then married her.

"You've got 2 kids trying to play parents, trying to be adults before our
time, and I end up going to the streets," he said.

In the robbery, he said Williams "got some change. I got nothing."

He was 20 when he arrived on death row.

"Honestly, I thought I'd be dead at 25," he said, describing his years in
prison as good and positive. "I was able to grow and do a few things,
experience life and meet different people.

"I don't want to die, but I've come to terms. No doubt, I'm regretful."

Tuesday evening, Robert Perez, 48, who prosecutors said was a high-ranking
officer in the notorious Mexican Mafia prison gang, received lethal
injection for a double killing in San Antonio in 1994. Perez had been
linked to more than a dozen other slayings in the mid-1990s in San
Antonio.

Nichols becomes the 8th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in
Texas and the 387th overall since the state resumed capital punishment on
December 7, 1982. Nichols becomes the 148th condemned inmate to be put to
death in Texas since Rick Perry became governor in 2001. 3 more Texas
inmates have execution dates this month. Next is Charles Nealy, 42, set to
die March 20 for the 1997 slaying of Dallas convenience store clerk Jiten
Bhakta, 25. A 2nd store employee also was killed in the robbery.

Nichols becomes the 9th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in
the USA and the 1066th overall since the nation resumed executions on
January 17, 1977.

(sources: Associated Press & Rick Halperin)

********************

Spring Break for advocates


31 years isn't considered a long time to live, but it's a long time to
wait to die.

Ronald Chambers has been on death row since the age of 21 for the Dallas
murder of Mike McMahon. Chambers waits to join the 385 already executed
since the 1976 reinstatement of the death penalty in Texas.

According to James W. Volberding, Chambers' lawyer of more than 10 years,
the convicted man spends his time thinking about what he did. Chambers and
an accomplice abducted McMahon and his date outside a Dallas club. They
then drove the couple to the Trinity River where they robbed and shot
them, killing McMahon.

"I think Chambers feels a great deal of remorse for all the harm he has
caused himself and the victims and the family," said Volberding. "He would
give anything to do it all over again."

Volberding said Chambers has been tried 3 times over the last 31 years.

He was given an execution date of Jan. 25, 2007, but due to the
possibility of a retrial, his fate is still pending.

Although Chambers is alone in his cell physically for about 23 hours of
his day in the Polunksy Unit, which houses Texas' death row inmates, he
isn't alone in spirit.

Some SMU students are trying to help people like Chambers. They are
participating in the Anti-Death Penalty Alternative Spring Break, designed
for students who want to see the death penalty abolished.

The state of Texas is the frontrunner for the number of executions
performed each year. In the last 30 years, 35 % of the nation's executions
were performed in Texas.

The alternative spring break is a 5-day event starting on March 13.
Participants will have the opportunity to meet with legislators or their
aides and learn how to write press releases.

Junior Cynthia Halatyn is one of several SMU students going to Austin. She
will join college and high school students from across the United States.

"I think people tend to forget that the reality of it is they are still
people," Halatyn said. "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights says
everyone has the right to life."

Halatyn also said she sees a trend worldwide away from the death penalty.
All western European nations and 12 American states have abolished it.
However, Texas is not following this trend - the state is looking into
expanding the death penalty. This week House Bill 8, a version of
Jessica's Law that will punish second sexual assault child offenders with
the death penalty, is going to be voted on.

However, not all SMU students agree that the death penalty should be
abolished. SMU senior Chris Limbaugh thinks it is a well-deserved
punishment.

"I think that is a balanced justice; you commit a capital crime, you can
receive a capital punishment," said Limbaugh. "You'd be letting a lot of
very guilty people off the hook. I think it's a necessary element of
justice."

SMU Human Rights Education Director Rick Halperin doesn't agree with
legalizing killing people, and he noted the flaws in the prosecution
process.

According to Halperin, one Texas man, Kerry Cook, was on death row for 22
years. He was 18 when he received his sentence but was found innocent at
40 after multiple trials, three of which found him guilty.

Cook will make an appearance on SMU's campus on April 12 for a book
signing. His story, "Chasing Justice," came out late last month.

Halperin, who is also the current president of the Texas Coalition to
Abolish the Death Penalty, fervently defends the human rights of death
penalty inmates even if that means sometimes defying law enforcement
officers.

"I've been arrested several times for protesting the death penalty at the
United States Supreme Court," said Halperin.

According to Halperin, there is an SMU student who graduated in the late
1980s currently on death row.

"Sooner or later he's going to get a date to be put to death and this
university is going to have to come to grips, even momentarily, with this
issue," Halperin said.

For more information on the Anti-Death Penalty Alternative spring break go
to www.texasabolition.org/pages/events/2006springbreak/2006.htm

(source: Southern Methodist University Daily Campus)

*******************

Death penalty for hardcore repeat offenders approved


Texas could sentence some hardcore child molesters to death under a bill
given preliminary approval Monday by the state House of Representatives.
In a bill designed to crack down on sex offenders who repeatedly prey on
children, the House voted to create a new category of crime continual
sexual abuse of a young child or children that carries a minimum of 25
years to life in prison and possibly the death penalty for a second
offense.

The bill represented a compromise after the House delayed a vote on a
broader death penalty provision over constitutional concerns and worries
it might lead some molesters to kill their victims.

Lawmakers said they talked with district attorneys, defense lawyers and
victim advocacy groups before coming back for a vote on Monday.

"This bill is supposed to go after the true pedophiles ... the worst of
the worst," said Rep. Dan Gattis, R-Georgetown, a Republican and former
prosecutor who drafted the compromise.

"Nothing we do will be more important," Rep. Debbie Riddle, R-Tomball, who
filed the original bill, said before the 118-23 vote of approval. The bill
still must get a final vote before going to the Senate, which is
considering a similar measure.

The bill is named Jessica's Law after Jessica Lunsford, a Florida girl who
was abducted and killed. More than a dozen states have passed versions of
Jessica's Law to crack down on sex offenders and Gov. Rick Perry has
deemed passage of a child sex offender bill a legislative emergency.

The Texas version would make the Lone Star State the 6th to allow some
child sex offenders to be sentenced to death, although some legal experts
question whether it is constitutional to use the ulimate penalty in cases
where the victim did not die.

In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court threw out the death penalty in a Georgia
rape case. Louisiana has one inmate on death row in a child sex crime but
the case is still subject to appeals in state and federal courts.

The House bill defines continuous sexual abuse of a young child as more
than 1 sex act committed against a victim younger than 14 over a period of
30 days or more.

The 1st offense would carry 25 to 99 years in prison. If an offender was
released and later convicted of the same crime again, he or she would face
life without parole or the death penalty.

Lawmakers created a "Romeo and Juliet" exception to avoid prosecuting a
situation that might be a high school romance, such as a 17-year old
senior and a 13-year-old freshman engaging in consensual sex. That could
still be punishable under statutory rape laws, but not the new, harsher
continual assault law.

The bill also removes the statute of limitations for many sex crimes
against children, including indecency with a child and aggravated sexual
assault. The current limit to bring charges is 10 years after the victim's
18th birthday.

(source: Associated Press)

******************

Prison gang leader executed in deaths of San Antonio men


The leader of a notorious prison gang was all smiles before being put to
death by lethal injection Tuesday evening.

Robert Martinez Perez's sons, wife and brother greeted him with smiles and
waves as they entered the viewing chamber.

"Ernest, Christopher, Ochente, Mary and Jennifer, tell all the kids I love
them and never forget," Perez said in his final statement. "Tell Bobby,
Mr. Bear will be dancing for them. Tell Bear not to feel bad. My love
always, I love you all. Stay strong, Mary. Take care of them."

Perez was convicted of the 1994 shooting death of 2 Hispanic males, Joe
Travieso and Robert Rivas in San Antonio.

Perez shot both of them with a .380-caliber pistol, 9-millimeter pistol
and a .38-caliber pistol during an internal power struggle within the
Mexican Mafia.

Police arrested Perez at his home in November 1994 7 months after the
shootings where they discovered $30,000 in U.S. currency, a magazine clip
with ammunition and a large quantity of jewelry.

No members of the victims' families were present.

Perez, 48, who rose to the rank of "general" in the military-structured
Mexican Mafia gang, was the seventh prisoner executed this year in Texas,
the nation's most active death penalty state, and the first of two in as
many nights.

A civil lawsuit on Perez's behalf challenging the Texas execution
procedures was dismissed in a Houston federal court last week.

Perez already was headed for a federal life prison term on racketeering
and conspiracy convictions for a series of robberies, drug deals and
murders in San Antonio from 1994 through 1997 when he was tried on state
charges for the 1994 slayings of Travieso and Rivas.

Their fatal shootings came during what authorities said was a struggle
within the gang, which lost its Texas "founder and president" Heriberto
"Herbie" Huerta when he was convicted in 1994 on federal racketeering
charges and sentenced to life in federal prison.

Huertas imprisonment left a split in the group founded to provide
protection for Hispanic inmates in Texas prisons.

Perez, on probation for a manslaughter conviction, took over one of the
gang's factions and the rivalry with another faction prompted the killings
of Travieso, 34, who was in a wheelchair with injuries from a previous
shooting, and Rivas, 27.

Travieso's nephew who was at the shooting scene testified against Perez,
along with 2 of Perez's companions. Another witness was an informant who
had served as Perez's triggerman.

Evidence also tied Perez a father of 8 to more than a dozen other
slayings, including an infamous San Antonio gangland-style execution of
five people in 1997 known as the West French Place killings.

The trial was moved from San Antonio to Dallas because of publicity in
Perez's hometown.

"We presented evidence of between 12 and 18 homicides, all of which
occurred while Robert was general of the Mexican Mafia here in San
Antonio," said federal prosecutor Mary Green, who was a Bexar County
assistant district attorney when she tried Perez. "I found out later he
never pulled the trigger after the double (murders) in April 1994. All the
others were ones he ordered through the years."

Perez declined to speak with reporters in the weeks preceding his
execution date. He did not testify at his capital murder trial.

"That was his choice," defense lawyer David Bires said. "I felt like he
had a fairly decent self-defense claim.

"There had been essentially another group of people that was plotting to
assassinate him and the groups came into contact and it resulted in a
shooting. There was evidence shots were fired from both sides."

But Bires said without Perez's own testimony, "It was hard to make
self-defense fly. ... Then the punishment phase was so horrendous, proving
up 13 other homicides. The punishment phase was absolutely gruesome."

Jurors sentenced him to death.

On an Internet site inmates use to seek penpals, Perez said he couldn't
promise letter writers much more than friendship and a "vow to be honest,
respectful, understanding and a very good listener. I give you my loyalty
in all aspects."

Jeff Mulliner, who was an assistant Bexar County district attorney who
also helped prosecute Perez, said Perez was "someone who did bad things
and has a whole dimensional shading to his character." But Mulliner, now
in private practice, also found Perez to have "an abundance of charisma, a
keen intellect, a sharp wit and a sense of humor."

"I kind of appreciated all those things about him," Mulliner said. "Other
than French Place, which is a footnote, I believe part of the honor of
Robert Perez is he was not dangerous to an elderly lady trying to cross
the street or to a young man on the bus to work. I think the only people
in danger from Robert Perez were people he was associated with that didnt
follow the rules."

Set to follow Perez to the death chamber Wednesday evening was Joseph
Nichols, convicted in the fatal shooting of a Houston convenience store
clerk more than 25 years ago.

(source: Huntsville Item)

**************

Jury weighs death penalty in Whitaker case-----Whitaker admits guilt in
killings and takes stand to say he's changed


After convicting Bart Whitaker of capital murder Monday, the jury in his
trial began deliberating today whether he will get a life sentence or the
death penalty.

Prosecutor Fred Felcman said in his closing statement that Whitaker is a
continuing threat to society, arguing that Whitaker had already received
probation for burglary and had also been caught in one previous plot to
kill his family.

"Nothing stops him. You can't stop him until he's in his grave," Felcman
said.

Whitaker admitted Tuesday he masterminded the plan to kill his mother and
brother but said he is a different person now and has found God.

"The only people I've ever hated, and all for the wrong reasons, were my
parents and my brother," Whitaker testified in a Fort Bend County
courtroom.

"I always felt that whatever love they gave me was based on a standard I
couldn't reach."

Bart Whitaker's testimony came after his father and uncle asked jurors to
sentence Whitaker to life in prison rather than handing down a death
sentence.

The 27-year-old's decision to testify surprised many people in the crowded
courtroom of state District Judge Cliff Vacek.

He was convicted Monday of engineering a plan to eliminate his family so
he could inherit a $1 million family estate. Bart Whitaker was arrested in
Mexico and returned to Texas in September 2005.

He took the stand just moments after his father, Kent Whitaker, told
jurors he had forgiven his son for killing Kent's wife, Patricia, 51, and
other son, Kevin, 19. The Whitakers were shot when they returned home from
dinner to their Sugar Land home.

Defense attorney Randy McDonald asked Bart if he was responsible for the
Dec. 10, 2003, attack.

"I'm 100 percent guilty. I put the plan in motion, " Whitaker said. "If I
had not done that it wouldn't have happened."

Whitaker admitted he had lied to many people throughout his life and said
he would accept whatever punishment the jury decided on.

He testified that he felt disconnected from people and his family and said
he believed his family's love for him was conditional.

"It was based on a standard I could not reach," Whitaker said. "That was
my perception."

Sobbing on the stand----McDonald then asked Whitaker if he knew what
impact his actions had on people.

Whitaker began crying and said, "Everyone I ever met in my whole life, I
feel sorry for having come in contact with me."

"Are you a criminal?" McDonald asked.

"Absolutely," Whitaker said.

Felcman, who is well-known in Fort Bend County legal circles for his
prowess in cross-examining defendants, immediately fired a barrage of
questions at Whitaker.

Felcman asked Whitaker why he did not plead guilty to begin with and what
would have happened if the jury found him not guilty.

"I didn't think that was possible," Whitaker said.

Testimony by Whitaker painted a picture of a young man who received a
generous allowance, whose college tuition was paid for and who had access
to an $80,000 annuity upon turning 21.

Felcman then walked Whitaker through the night of the slayings and
Whitaker admitted that earlier testimony by co-defendant and getaway
driver Steve Champagne had been truthful. Champagne has accepted a 15-year
prison term for agreeing to testify.

Whitaker said he went out with his family for dinner to celebrate his
graduation, a graduation that would never happen because he had not been
enrolled in school.

While the family was dining at the restaurant, accused triggerman Chris
Brashear was waiting at the Whitaker house with a pistol. Brashear faces a
separate trial.

"You are out with your family and you knew they were supposed to be dead
within minutes," Felcman said.

"Yes, sir," Whitaker responded.

Father also favors life

Before Whitaker testified, his uncle, William Bartlett, the brother of
Patricia Whitaker, told jurors that family members want a life sentence
for Bart.

"We are worn out," Bartlett said." We need for this to go away."

Bart Whitaker's father, Kent Whitaker, said he, too, favored a life
sentence.

"I don't want my son to die," he said.

(source: Fort Bend Standard)

********************

Crime linked to Taco Land killer detailed


Cynthia Adame just was trying to get into her house, she testified Tuesday
in the punishment phase of Joseph Gamboa's capital murder trial.

But she was drawn into what prosecutors contend was a spree of shootings
and robberies by Gamboa and an unidentified partner just 2 days after
Gamboa shot three people while robbing Taco Land on June 24, 2005.

Jurors convicted Gamboa, 24, of capital murder last week for the fatal
shootings of Taco Land owner Ramiro "Ram" Ayala, 72, and doorman Douglas
"Gypsy Doug" Morgan, 53. Bartender Denise "Sunshine" Koger, 41, was
wounded.

Co-defendant Jose Najera, 31, is awaiting trial in the slayings.

For Gamboa to get the death penalty in the punishment phase of the trial,
prosecutors must convince jurors that he's a threat to society. They're
putting a string of crime victims on the stand.

Adame had come home late and without her keys, she said. While she was
banging on the door to wake her mother, a man in a Corvette pulled up to
her house just off South Presa Street and began asking questions. Then a
man she identified as Gamboa ran up, pointing a gun at her and demanding
the driver get out of his car. That driver sped off, with Gamboa firing at
him.

Adame dove beneath a nearby truck, she said, and Gamboa came after her,
firing shots on the ground and ordering her out. She complied as an older
car pulled up. Adame said her mother came outside and began shouting at
Gamboa to leave her alone, and Gamboa shot at her, too. Then he tried to
force Adame into the car. She thought of her son inside the house, she
said.

"I told him that he was going to have to shoot me, because I wasn't going
to get in," Adame said. Gamboa fled.

Testimony continues today.

(source: San Antonio Express-News)

******************

Blame in TYC scandal shouldn't bypass Capitol


Acitizen could get cross-eyed watching the Texas Legislature jump back and
forth between moral outrage and self-parody.

Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst last year began a highly publicized push to
stiffen penalties on child molesters, even to the point of the death
penalty. On Tuesday, the House gave final approval to just such a bill, a
so-called "Jessica's Law," with somewhat weaker penalties than sought by
Dewhurst.

The House action came even as the state's own Texas Youth Commission
continued to be rocked by a scandal involving sexual abuse of youths in
state custody by state-paid staff members - and how agency leaders failed
to lead. There are also reports that local prosecutors failed to act when
cases were referred to them.

Also on Tuesday, in a report by staff writer Mike Ward, the
American-Statesman disclosed that a figure at the center of the scandal,
Ray Brookins, 41, now of Austin, was believed by investigators to be a
person known as XXXRayVijon, on the Internet site MySpace.com. The site
has a picture of him posing and smiling with a pornographic performer
(both fully clothed) in Las Vegas.

Brookins was forced out as assistant superintendent at the TYC's West
Texas State School in Pyote in 2005 after allegations that he had been
sexually involved with youths incarcerated there. No criminal charges have
been filed against him.

An internal investigation found that Brookins had "pornographic Web sites
saved to the favorites files" on his home and office computers, though he
claimed he had no idea how they got there. But a security guard at the
West Texas school reported that a nude photo of Brookins had been found on
a private Internet sex club site.

The Legislature was still taking in that revelation on Tuesday when state
Sen. Jane Nelson, R-Lewisville, issued a statement entitled: "MySpace.com
safety bill advances in Senate."

Nelson's Senate Bill 136 directs the Texas School Safety Center to work
with the attorney general to write guidelines to help youths "protect
themselves against online predators who routinely scan personal profiles
posted on social networking sites such as MySpace.com in search of
victims."

If written, perhaps the guidelines should first be sent to youths in the
state's own facilities.

Gov. Rick Perry and the Legislature are pounding hard on the commission,
as well they should. But the governor and lawmakers also ought to engage
in what the religious call an "examination of conscience."

Like other state agencies, TYC in recent years has faced a state budget
crunch. Executive Director Dwight Harris, who suddenly retired Feb. 23 as
the scandal broke, had asked for a major increase in the number of guards,
more training for the guards and more money for cameras and monitoring
equipment.

In all, the commission asked for $596.3 million over the next 2-year
budget cycle, a 17 percent increase over its current spending of $509.5
million. The Legislative Budget Board - led by Dewhurst and House Speaker
Tom Craddick - recommended a cut, to $491.5 million. Perry proposed
slashing the commission's budget 11 percent, to $453.2 million.

Of course, low pay, lack of training and short staffing do not justify or
excuse sexual contact between staff members and youths held by the state.
But the governor and Legislature ought to consider whether their devotion
to paring the budget down at all costs helped foster conditions that made
it easier for such abuse to occur and go unchecked for so long.

(source: Austin American-Statesman)





************************

Prosecutors to seek death penalty in 2006 slaying----Police accused Selwyn
Davis of attacking 2 people before killing girlfriend's mother.


With his chin up and his shoulders back, Selwyn P. Davis had no visible
reaction when state District Judge Julie Kocurek asked prosecutors Tuesday
whether they would seek the death penalty against him.

Davis, 25, is charged with capital murder in the Aug. 22, 2006, death of
his girlfriend's mother, Regina Lara, 57, who was stabbed to death in her
38 1/2 Street apartment. Court documents say the killing came during a
violent 2-day crime spree in which Davis broke his girlfriend's jaw and
fractured her eye socket, sliced his uncle with a knife multiple times and
tried to hit an Austin police officer with a minivan.

"We will be seeking the death penalty," Assistant District Attorney Judy
Shipway said. Davis remained quiet as Kocurek said she may set the case
for an October trial.

The decision to seek a death sentence is rare for Travis County District
Attorney Ronnie Earle, who estimates his office pursues the death penalty
at most once or twice a year. Many defendants opt to plead guilty and
accept life in prison to avoid the death penalty.

The last person sent to death row from Travis County was Guy Allen, found
guilty in 2002 of fatally stabbing his former girlfriend Barbara Allen and
her daughter Janette Johnson. He is one of four people from Travis County
on death row.

Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, Travis County has sent 15
people to death row, fewer than any other urban county, according to the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Harris County tops the list with 282
people sent to death row in that time.

"We look at future dangerousness and future threat to other people," Earle
said, declining to comment on Davis' case specifically.

On Tuesday, Kocurek appointed defense lawyers Steve Brittain and Allan
Williams to represent Davis. The lawyers said they were too unfamiliar
with the case to comment.

For every capital murder case, Earle convenes a panel of his top deputies
to discuss the facts, then recommend whether to seek the death penalty.
Earle said the committee unanimously recommended that he seek the death
penalty against Davis.

A police affidavit said Davis' crime spree began Aug. 21, 2006, when he
attacked his girlfriend, Linda Martinez, at an apartment they shared in
the Lafayette Landing apartments on Burton Drive between East Riverside
Drive and Oltorf Street. Davis punched, strangled and cut Martinez with a
razor blade, slicing her thigh, breaking her jaw and fracturing her eye
socket, the affidavit said.

Later that evening, Davis went to his aunt and uncle's house near East
Stassney Lane in South Austin and asked for a place to stay, another
police affidavit said. When his uncle refused, Davis attacked him with a
knife, cutting him on his hands, arm and right cheek, the affidavit said.
Davis took money and a car keys from his aunt and fled, the affidavit
said.

Police responded to Lara's apartment after neighbors called 911 to report
a possible burglary and stabbing. When Davis spotted the officers, he
retreated into Lara's apartment, left through a back window and fled the
scene in Lara's minivan, nearly hitting an officer, court documents say.
He is accused of killing Lara sometime the next day.

(source: Austin American-Statesman)

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...